American • Washington vs. the middle class
|By Anthony Mirhaydari, MSN Money
Washington vs. the middle class
Wage-earners are about to take it on the chin, again. And our choices in November are a president who has done too little to help the economy and a challenger who wants to do still less.
.There’s nothing like an election to bring out the worst in our politics. Especially one in the midst of a terrible balance-sheet morass. People are desperate. They’re angry. And they’re realizing the politicos in Washington just don’t get it.
Witness the recent backlash and Republican foaming at the mouth over President Barack Obama’s comment on Friday that the private sector, which has created 4.3 million jobs over the past 27 months, was "doing fine" (compared with the public sector, which has lost more than 1 million jobs).
Behind the perceived insensitivity, Obama had a valid point. Government workers are being purged, adding to the unemployment rolls. Yet it seems this is what people want.
You can feel the tide turning as those stung by the globalized economy (manufacturing workers, for example) turn on their brothers and sisters in the tax-fueled economy that is the government payroll. Voters are saying, "How dare they get raises and a good retirement!" instead of asking why the rest of us don’t.
What’s middle class in 2012?
Wisconsin’s union-busting governor, Scott Walker, made headlines last week by winning his closely watched recall election. Voters supported his actions to cut public worker benefits and collective-bargaining rights. Similar efforts are under way in California; both San Diego and San Jose voted to tighten pay and benefits for public workers.
But this is a scorched-earth approach, focusing on what we can take away from others instead of how to make things better for everyone. We’re talking reallocation of resources, not fresh growth or new jobs. Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney illustrated this view with his own gaffe, complaining that Obama wants "more firemen, more policemen and more teachers."
.In other words, we’re inviting our political leaders to rain fire on yet another sector of the already bloodied middle class. The war has already begun, and the middle class is losing. It’s about to get much worse as Washington pushes us off a fiscal cliff.
Down, and nearly out
First, consider our current predicament. Here’s a list of middle-class miseries that comes courtesy of Gluskin Sheff economist David Rosenberg, who compiled most of it. I added a few items:
•Forty-five million Americans (one in seven) are on food stamps.
•One in seven is unemployed or underemployed.
Up Next0 Gen X is anxious, says TD Ameritrade presidentTom Bradley, president of TD Ameritrade, explains why Generation X remains so troubled. "You have to encourage the younger generation to save now while they can," he tells CNBC’s Mandy Drury. CNBC’s Steve Liesman weighs in.ShareGen X is anxious, says TD Ameritrade president
Tom Bradley, president of TD Ameritrade, explains why Generation X remains so troubled. "You have to encourage the younger generation to save now while they… More Tom Bradley, president of TD Ameritrade, explains why Generation X remains so troubled. "You have to encourage the younger generation to save now while they can," he tells CNBC’s Mandy Drury. AddedGen X is anxious, says TD Ameritrade president CNBC
Date 6/12/12 10:02
Tooltip Information:Gen X is anxious, says TD Ameritrade president Video by: Description: Tom Bradley, president of TD Ameritrade, explains why Generation X remains so troubled. "You have to encourage the younger generation to save now while they can," he tells CNBC’s Mandy Drury. CNBC’s Steve Liesman weighs in.Rating: 4Views: 6314
Tooltip Information:The Ed Show: Fed study shows middle class suffering the most Season 2012 : Episode 0612 on Description: June 12: The Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances study shows the average American family’s net worth dropped 38.8% between 2007 and 2010. The average family’s net worth dropped from more than $126,000, to less than $78,000. The housing crash is largely to blame, since most middle class Americans measure their net worth by their home’s value. Michael Eric Dyson discusses the latest with former Labor Secretary Robert Reich.Rating: 4Views: 9031 Duration:,Views:Rating:© This video must be watched on another web site. It cannot be added to My Playlist.
Loading… 1 of 4 7 •The percentage of those out of work defined as long-term unemployed is the highest (42%) since the Great Depression.
•Fifty-four percent of college graduates younger than 25 are unemployed or underemployed.
•Forty-seven percent of Americans receive some form of government assistance.
•Employment-to-population ratio for 25- to 54-year-olds is now 75.7%, lower than when the recession "ended" in June 2009.
•There are 7.7 million fewer full-time workers now than before the recession, and 3.3 million more part-time workers.
•Eight million people have left the labor force since the recession "ended" — adding those back in would put the unemployment rate at 12% instead of 8.2%.
•The number of unemployed looking for work for at least 27 weeks jumped 310,000 in May, the sharpest increase in a year.
•Just 14% of high-school graduates believe they will have a more successful financial future than their parents.
•The male unemployment rate for ages 16 to 19 is 27%; for ages 20 to 24, it is 13%.
•Because of structural problems such as negative home equity (which keeps people from moving for work) and skills erosion (from long-term unemployment), UBS economists estimate that the economy’s natural unemployment rate has increased from 5.7% before the recession to 8.6% now. This acts as a speed limit on potential economic growth.
•Between 2007 and 2010, median family net worth fell nearly 40%, while median inflation-adjusted incomes before taxes fell nearly 8%.
Ugly stuff. And it’s about to get a lot worse.
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Thu Jun 14, 2012 8:40 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com