William Wan writes in the Washington Post that in China
Citizens have been punished for crimes as trivial as writing an unflattering blog post about a local official.Trivial indeed. Worse than trivial. Not crimes at all. Just normal speech in a free society. But of course China isn’t a free society. Despite its moves toward markets and profits, China remains a one-party state still characterized by state ownership of the commanding heights of the economy. And that party is the Communist party, a party born to eradicate capitalism, a party that as it came to power in 1949 spoke of “the extinction of classes, state power and parties,” of “a socialist and communist society,” of the nationalization of private enterprise and the socialization of agriculture, of a “great and splendid socialist state” in Russia, and especially of “a powerful state apparatus” in the hands of a “people’s democratic dictatorship.” That’s a vision that doesn’t fit very well with “unflattering blog post[s] about a local official.” The problem is endemic to socialism. Robert Heilbroner, a distinguished American intellectual who called himself a socialist (though the New York Times declined to be so rude in its obituary), was admirably candid in explaining the place of dissent in a socialist society in a 1978 article in, well, Dissent:
Socialism … must depend for its economic direction on some form of planning, and for its culture on some form of commitment to the idea of a morally conscious collectivity… If tradition cannot, and the market system should not, underpin the socialist order, we are left with some form of command as the necessary means for securing its continuance and adaptation. Indeed, that is what planning means… The factories and stores and farms and shops of a socialist socioeconomic formation must be coordinated … and this coordination must entail obedience to a central plan… The rights of individuals to their Millian liberties [are] directly opposed to the basic social commitment to a deliberately embraced collective moral goal… Under socialism, every dissenting voice raises a threat similar to that raised under a democracy by those who preach antidemocracy.That is, even an unflattering blog post about a local official threatens “the basic social commitment to a deliberately embraced collective moral goal” under the direction of “a powerful state apparatus” in the hands of a “people’s democratic dictatorship.” So we deplore China’s use of labor camps “as an expedient way to silence critics,” in the words of the Post, but we shouldn’t be surprised by it. Indeed, a front-page article in today’s Post on Hugo Chavez’s legacy refers to
the tenets of what Chavez called 21st-century socialism—intervening in the economy, putting state institutions under the executive’s control and corralling opponents and the press.Sounds a lot like 20th-century socialism.
View full post on Cato @ Liberty
Asian countries head financial crimes list
By Jim Lobe
WASHINGTON – The developing world lost nearly US$1 trillion in 2010 as a result of corruption, tax evasion, and other financial crimes not involving cash transactions, according to a report by Global Financial Integrity (GFI). The six-year-old research and advocacy group said global financial corruption has grown steadily over the past decade despite unprecedented efforts by governments and non-governmental organizations to curb it.
It found that illicit financial outflows cost developing countries a total of $859 billion in 2010, the latest year for which trade and other data compiled mainly by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank is available.
That sum was approximately 10 times the roughly $88 billion provided to developing countries in official development assistance that same year. "This means that for every $1 in economic
development assistance going into developing countries, $10 are lost via these illicit outflows", GFI noted.
The group’s lead economist and report co-author, Dev Kar, stressed that the latest estimate almost certainly underestimated the total amount of illicit flows, in part because it did not include cash transactions and because it was based on a new, more-conservative methodology than GFI used in the past.
The latter method estimated that developing economies lost about $1.14 trillion in illicit outflows in 2010.
"The estimates provided by either methodology are still likely to be extremely conservative as they do not include trade mispricing in services, same-invoice trade mispricing, hawala transactions and dealings conducted in bulk cash," according to Kar, who previously served as a senior IMF economist.
"This means that much of the proceeds of drug trafficking, human smuggling, and other criminal activities, which are often settled in cash, are not included in these estimates," he added.
The 80-page report, "Illicit Financial Flows From Developing Countries: 2001-2010", found that China suffered the greatest losses resulting from illicit outflows a yearly average of $274 billion over the century’s first decade, or $2.74 trillion from 2001 through 2010, and $420.36 billion in 2010 alone.
China was followed by Mexico, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, and Russia. Mexico averaged yearly losses of $47.6 billion and $51.2 billion in 2010; Malaysia, an average of $28.5 billion but a whopping $64.38 billion in 2010; Saudi Arabia, a $21 billion yearly average and $38.2 billion in 2010; and Russia, a $15.2 billion average and $43.6 billion in 2010.
Other countries that were ranked in the top 10 for 2010 losses included Iraq ($22.2 billion); Nigeria ($19.66 billion); Costa Rica ($17.51 billion); the Philippines ($16.62 billion); and Thailand ($12.37 billion).
While most of the hardest hit economies are middle-income countries, or even high-income nations, such as Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, some of the worlds poorest countries are also victims. In addition to Nigeria and the Philippines, Sudan ($8.58 billion) and Ethiopia ($5.64 billion) were also among the biggest losers in 2010, while India ranked eighth in average annual losses over the decade ($12.3 billion).
"Astronomical sums of dirty money continue to flow out of the developing world and into off-shore tax havens and developed-country banks," said GFI director Raymond Baker.
"It is clear: developing economies are hemorrhaging more and more money at a time when rich and poor countries alike are struggling to spur economic growth. This report should be a wake-up call to world leaders that more must be done to address these harmful outflows."
The report comes amidst increased global attention to corruption as a hindrance to development. Corruption and its threats to the long-running rule of the Communist Party – were a major theme at last months 18th National Congress in China that transferred power to the new president, Xi Jinping.
Grassroots anti-corruption movements in Russia have spurred a major crackdown, in contrast to India where they have gained the national spotlight. Meanwhile, both traditional aid donors are increasingly conditioning their assistance on how committed beneficiary governments are to eliminating corruption by officials.
According to the GFI report, "trade mispricing" accounted for most of the illicit outflows from developing countries over the past decade. When, for example, an exporter in a developing country sells $2 million worth of goods to a foreign company for $1.5 million, the exporter may ask that the extra half million dollars be placed in his or her own private overseas bank account, presumably to avoid taxation.
Conversely, companies may overprice imports and likewise arrange to have the illicit proceeds deposited overseas.
Illicit transfers can also be conducted through related forms of corruption, including bribery, kickbacks, as well as outright theft, according to the report.
Over the 2001-2010 period, the report estimated that developing countries lost an annual average of about $586 billion in such illicit flows – or a total of $5.86 trillion over the decade.
In dollar terms, illicit flows increased in real terms by a yearly average of about 8.6% despite the onset of the global financial crisis at the end of 2008. The increase took place in every developing region, with the Middle East and North Africa leading the pack (26.3% average annual increase), followed closely by Sub-Saharan Africa (23.8%).
The average annual increase for Asia, which accounted about 61% of total illicit flows from the developing world, came to nearly 8%, while, in Latin America and the Caribbean, the increase was lowest – at 2.65%.
The latest report did not address cash transactions, which are far more difficult to track. In a previous report, GFI estimated that drug trafficking, which is most often conducted in cash, produces annual profits of about $320 billion in both developed and developing countries.
Another illicit industry – counterfeiting of both merchandise and currency – produces another $250 billion a year, although it is generally less reliant on cash, according to GFI. Proceeds from cross-border human trafficking were estimated at about $31.6 billion a year.
In dealing with the problem of illicit financial outflows, the report called for, among other measures, the adoption of new conventions and laws requiring the identification of the beneficial owners of all banking and securities accounts and the "true, human owners of all corporations, trusts, and foundations" when they are formed.
It also called for reforming customs and trade protocols to better detect trade mispricing. Moreover, multinational corporations should be required on a country-by-country basis to report all sales, profits, and taxes paid. In addition, tax information on both personal and business accounts should be automatically exchanged between countries, according to the report.
Jim Lobe’s blog on US foreign policy can be read at http://www.lobelog.com.
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:14 am
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Jim Rickards: Tim Geithner “Aided and Abetted” LIBOR Crimes
The economy is the main event but the LIBOR scandal will be on the under-card when Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies before Congress again today.
At issue is what the Fed, and other bank regulators, knew about manipulation of the key lending rate and whether they condoned banks giving low-ball estimates of LIBOR in order to make themselves look healthier during the crisis of 2008.
Bernanke is likely to face some inquires about this issue, but the U.S. regulator most questions are being asked about is Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, who is set to testify about the matter before the House Financial Services committee next week.
In 2008, while President of the NY Fed, Geithner sent a memo to British regulators to raise concerns about potential manipulation of LIBOR, as has been widely reported and confirmed Friday by the NY Fed.
This 4:32 video was posted on "The Daily Ticker" website yesterday morning…and was picked up by finance.yahoo.com Internet site yesterday
Statistics: Posted by DIGGER DAN — Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:08 am
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com