Peter Schweizer: “Government grows, because it’s profitable when it grows” (for crony capitalists)

We have a lot of love for Peter Schweizer at ACC. I know him personally and had him on a panel discussing crony capitalism that I did in New York last October. He is for real. He pulls no punches, and he punches both sides of the aisle.
This short speech which he gave at CPAC last week is excellent. In 6 minutes he explains why it is so important that we fight crony capitalism and why the fight in Washington for the soul of the Republic might be more cultural than ideological. Washington itself stinks. Versailles on the Potomac is rotten and the rot is found all over, in both parties.
As Peter says in the speech, many who once called Washington DC a “cesspool” get elected get comfortable, and then come to see DC as less a “cesspool” and more like a hot tub to party in. Politicians and hot tubs are not a good mix. I believe Ted Kennedy had one installed in his Senate office.
The post Peter Schweizer: “Government grows, because it’s profitable when it grows” (for crony capitalists) appeared first on AgainstCronyCapitalism.org.
View full post on AgainstCronyCapitalism.org
The American Consumer Grows Up
Sallie James
An article in Politico on Monday looked at the declining influence of agriculture in DC (I wish), comparing the touching/nauseating Chrysler ad paying homage to the American farmer that was aired during the Superbowl with the relative lack of political attention given to farm programs. How come people feel all warm and fuzzy when they watch the ad, and yet poor little agriculture can’t get any love?
Trying to sell Ram trucks, Chrysler made a splash in the Super Bowl this month with a two-minute television spot celebrating the American farmer — a montage of handsome still photos and a vintage Paul Harvey speech all ending with the pitch: “For the farmer in all of us.”
Nine days later, the picture was very different as President Barack Obama skipped over farmers entirely in his State of the Union address, never mentioning the yearlong farm bill stalemate in Congress nor even including “agriculture” among the thousands of words spoken that night…
“Agriculture has become so efficient, so few people actually raise the food … the American consumer has become almost like high school kids,” [House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank] Lucas said. “It’s always been there, it will always be there. Dad can I have the keys to the car? Does the car have gas in it? Oh, it will always have gas in it, right Dad?”
Are American consumers like teenagers? Are they spoiled, and taking agricultural production for granted? Is that why the farm bill is such a heavy lift? Or perhaps, just perhaps, the American consumer is growing up, questioning the cost and necessity of farm subsidies, and no longer falling for myths about the need for farm subsidies to prevent mass starvation. My colleague David Boaz, in a 2011 blog post, summarised the reasons why folks might oppose spending programs. As I read the Politico article and, specifically, the whining by the agri-industrial complex and its political backers, David’s second point came to mind:
We know that many wonderful things, perhaps including truly fast trains, could be created at massive cost, but that you always have to weigh costs and benefits. Children say, “I want it.” Adults say, “How much does it cost, and what would I have to give up to have it?”
View full post on Cato @ Liberty
The American Consumer Grows Up
Sallie James
An article in Politico on Monday looked at the declining influence of agriculture in DC (I wish), comparing the touching/nauseating Chrysler ad paying homage to the American farmer that was aired during the Superbowl with the relative lack of political attention given to farm programs. How come people feel all warm and fuzzy when they watch the ad, and yet poor little agriculture can’t get any love?
Trying to sell Ram trucks, Chrysler made a splash in the Super Bowl this month with a two-minute television spot celebrating the American farmer — a montage of handsome still photos and a vintage Paul Harvey speech all ending with the pitch: “For the farmer in all of us.”
Nine days later, the picture was very different as President Barack Obama skipped over farmers entirely in his State of the Union address, never mentioning the yearlong farm bill stalemate in Congress nor even including “agriculture” among the thousands of words spoken that night…
“Agriculture has become so efficient, so few people actually raise the food … the American consumer has become almost like high school kids,” [House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank] Lucas said. “It’s always been there, it will always be there. Dad can I have the keys to the car? Does the car have gas in it? Oh, it will always have gas in it, right Dad?”
Are American consumers like teenagers? Are they spoiled, and taking agricultural production for granted? Is that why the farm bill is such a heavy lift? Or perhaps, just perhaps, the American consumer is growing up, questioning the cost and necessity of farm subsidies, and no longer falling for myths about the need for farm subsidies to prevent mass starvation. My colleague David Boaz, in a 2011 blog post, summarised the reasons why folks might oppose spending programs. As I read the Politico article and, specifically, the whining by the agri-industrial complex and its political backers, David’s second point came to mind:
We know that many wonderful things, perhaps including truly fast trains, could be created at massive cost, but that you always have to weigh costs and benefits. Children say, “I want it.” Adults say, “How much does it cost, and what would I have to give up to have it?”
View full post on Cato @ Liberty
If Spending Is Capped So It Grows at the Rate of Inflation, the Budget Is Balanced in 2018
Daniel J. Mitchell
New 10-year budget projections have been released by the Congressional Budget Office, so it’s time once again for me to show how easy it is to balance the budget with modest spending restraint (though never forget that our goal should be smaller government, not fiscal balance).
- I first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew by 2 percent annually.
- I repeated the exercise in January 2011 after new CBO numbers were released, and re-confirmed that a spending cap of 2 percent would eliminate red ink in just 10 years.
- In August of that year, following the release of the CBO Update, I showed again that the budget could be balanced in just a decade by limiting spending so it climbed by 2 percent per year.
- Back in January after CBO produced the new Economic and Budget Outlook, I crunched the numbers again and showed how a spending cap of 2 percent would balance the budget over 10 years.
- Since even a weak economic recovery generates more revenue, the CBO numbers from last August showed that the budget could be balanced if spending was restrained so that it grew by 2.5 percent per year for a 10-year period.
The new numbers show the path is even easier. The budget can be balanced in 5 years if spending grows at the rate of inflation (the green line) and in just 10 years if spending is limited so that it grows 3.4 percent annually (the light blue line).
Today’s path to balance is even easier because of better 10-year growth numbers, and also because of projections that the recent tax increase will generate more revenue (the dark blue line shows total projected revenue over the decade).
Because of Laffer Curve reasons, I’m skeptical about whether all that additional revenue will materialize, so both the chart and the underlying numbers are a bit speculative.
But what they do show is that the nation’s fiscal problems easily can be addressed with some modest spending restraint. Sort of a practical application of Mitchell’s Golden Rule.
Here’s my video explaining the importance of spending restraint. The numbers are now outdated, but the concept is still completely relevant.
As noted at the beginning of the post, I’m much more concerned about reducing the burden of government spending. Balancing the budget is a secondary concern.
That’s why we should impose genuine budget cuts and not just restrain the growth of spending. That would also make it easier to adopt good tax policy.
Maybe, in a parallel universe where politicians are motivated by liberty, we can even get entitlement reform and a flat tax.
View full post on Cato @ Liberty
How Washington Grows Rich
David Boaz
I see that I’m quoted in Annie Lowrey’s New York Times Magazine story, “Washington’s Economic Boom, Financed by You”:
David Boaz, executive vice president of the Cato Institute, told me: “Washington’s economy is based on the confiscation and transfer of wealth produced elsewhere. Out in the country they’re growing food, building cars and designing software — all these things that raise our standard of living. Here in Washington, everyone is writing memos to each other about how to take some of that money and which special interest should get it.” I asked him if he liked living in the city, which has become undeniably nicer. Boaz sputtered a bit. “I can’t walk to lunch from my office without having to avoid the construction projects!” he said. “For Washington, it does mean better restaurants and better entertainment, and the potholes get filled faster. But for the country as a whole? I don’t think it’s a good thing for America.”
I’m confident I didn’t sputter, but otherwise this sounds right. I’ve been writing about the wealth of the Washington area and where it comes from for years.
In 2005 I wrote about – yes – the construction projects that block my way to lunch in a “big-government building boom.”
In 2006 I leaned on Waymon and Willie to offer some advice to parents:
Mammas, don’t let your babies grow up to be cowboys,
Don’t let ’em make software and sell people trucks,
Make ’em be bureaucrats and fed’rals and such.
Here are a few other links to discussions of Washington’s wealth, starting with the most recent news:
http://www.cato.org/blog/happy-new-year-washington
http://www.cato.org/blog/its-fall-washington-livin-still-good
http://www.cato.org/blog/lobbying-booming-business-politicized-economy
http://www.cato.org/blog/obamas-k-street-recovery-plan
http://www.cato.org/blog/no-recession-washington
http://www.cato.org/blog/washington-booming-bush-obama-years
I focused on why money flows to Washington way back in 1983 in the Wall Street Journal:
Business people know that you have to invest to make money. Businesses invest in factories, labor, research and development, marketing, and all the other processes that bring goods to consumers and, they hope, lead to profits. They also invest in political processes that may yield profits.
If more money can be made by investing in Washington than by drilling another oil well, money will be spent there.
Nobel laureate F.A. Hayek explained the process 40 years ago in his prophetic book The Road to Serfdom: “As the coercive power of the state will alone decide who is to have what, the only power worth having will be a share in the exercise of this directing power.”
As the size and power of government increase, we can expect more of society’s resources to be directed toward influencing government.
And all of this relates to an idea I discussed in Libertarianism: A Primer:
Libertarians developed a pre-Marxist class analysis that divided society into two basic classes: those who produced wealth and those who took it by force from others. Thomas Paine, for instance, wrote, “There are two distinct classes of men in the nation, those who pay taxes, and those who receive and live upon the taxes.” Similarly, Jefferson wrote in 1824, “We have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious.” Modern libertarians defend the right of productive people to keep what they earn, against a New Class of politicians and bureaucrats who would seize their earnings to transfer them to nonproducers.
Sheldon Richman has more on this libertarian class analysis that focused on “conflict between producers, no matter their station, and the parasitic political classes, both inside and outside the formal state,” or “between the tax-payers and tax-eaters.”
View full post on Cato @ Liberty
Technology and the Internet • IBM work force in U.S. keeps dropping but grows in India
IBM work force in N.C., U.S. keeps dropping but grows in India
By RICK SMITH, WRAL Tech Wire Editor
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N.C. — Where does IBM now employee more workers than anywhere else?
India.
Meanwhile, IBM’s work force in North Carolina is now well below 10,000.
And across the Triangle, where Big Blue employed more than 10,000 just a few years ago alone, the headcount has dropped to some 7,300.
IBM (NYSE: IBM) won’t talk about where it employees people geographically. So people trying to figure out what’s up with job numbers have to rely on sources and the occasional document that might be leaked.
Last week, ComputerWorld reported that it had seen a "document" showing IBM employs 112,000 people in India. That’s up from just 6,000 in 2002, the news site reported.
Indian media sources have reported similar numbers, and we’ve cited those in Tech Wire reports.
Meanwhile, Alliance at IBM, the union that seeks to represent IBM workers in the U.S., says its sources have provided information that says Big Blue headcount in the U.S., is down to 92,000.
Locally, the numbers are grim with under 10,000 workers across the sate and just 5,500 in RTP with another 1,800 in Durham, the Alliance tells WRAL News.
Some reductions are not surprising, given that IBM sold off its PC business and point-of-presence retail units, both of which were primarily based in Raleigh and the Triangle.
IBM’s headcount keeps dropping in N.C. and across the U.S. even as the ranks of Big Blue keep growing in India. According to Computer World, IBM has 112,000 workers across India. Meanwhile, the U.S. workforce is down to 92,000, says the union seeking to represent Big Blue employees.
"It does not surprise us that IBM India has more employees than IBM U.S.," Lee Conrad, national coordinator for the Alliance, said.
"For years we have been sounding the alarm that IBM corporate management has and is abandoning the U.S. for low cost countries, like India."
ComputerWorld reported that Indian IBM workers average $17,000 a year in compensation.
Conrad didn’t dispute the ComputerWorld story.
"Our sources tell us the information is accurate," he said.
Meanwhile, IBM’s numbers decline even as it does announce new hires such as an analytics center in Ohio that will employ some 500 people. That news was disclosed last week.
The latest IBM headcount estimate from Alliance at IBM follows. The asterisk notes Alliance estimates based on its own sources. IBM stopped reported employee count by geography in 2009.
The numbers:
2012: *92,000
2011: *98,000
2010:*101,000
2009: 105,000
2008: 115,000
2007: 121,000
2006: 127,000
2005: 133,789
http://wraltechwire.com/ibm-work-force- … /11837048/
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Mon Dec 03, 2012 5:33 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Business • Black Friday grows longer but impact appears to be shrinkin
Black Friday grows longer but impact appears to be shrinking
BY DAVID ROEDER Business Reporter/droeder@suntimes.com November 24, 2012
Yes, Black Friday shopping is now woven into the national culture and it’s overshadowing the relatively relaxed Thanksgiving holiday. But just as the phenomenon seems to get larger, it’s strangely getting smaller.
For all the reports of people lined up in the chill and jostling each other for goods that remained safely on the shelves just a couple days ago, Black Friday’s role in the year-end shopping blowout is slipping.
The National Retail Federation projects that 147 million people will shop from Friday through Sunday, down from 152 million people from last year’s three-day Thanksgiving weekend.
The average shopper this weekend was still expected to spend slightly more money compared with last year, by the federation’s reckoning. It also estimates that total retail sales for November and December will be $586.1 billion, up 4.1 percent from a year ago.
So spending is still there, but retailers have expanded the season for getting it. At Sears and Kmart stores, for example, a “shop your way” online program began offering extras rewards last Sunday for people who order online and pick up the item at a store, said Ron Boire, executive vice president at Sears Holdings Corp.
Boire said the promotion spread out the holiday rush at its stores throughout the week. Sears stores still opened at 8 p.m. Thursday to catch the early birds. By Friday the aisles were busy but not frantic, Boire said.
“It was a different kind of shopper, more relaxed,” he said. But he added that “there’s no doubt that consumers are stressed out given the high levels of unemployment and, perhaps more importantly, underemployment.”
Also changing the retail landscape is technology. Each year, more people are accustomed to ordering online and using Internet tools to shop for the best deals.
Merchants stepped up their online promotions for the weekend and Cyber Monday, the term for the first Monday after Thanksgiving. That’s when an estimated 72 million people return to their work computer and use the generous bandwidths to order gifts, despite the cost in worker productivity.
A survey by BIGinsight found that 97 percent of online merchants planned promotions for sometime during Thanksgiving weekend vs. 90 percent last year. A record 85 percent said they have deals on Cyber Monday.
The incentives typically start with free shipping.
The retail federation has its own web site, CyberMonday.com, as a clearinghouse for the offers. The site also will offer, in Groupon-like fashion, “deals of the hour” through Monday.
For the brick-and-mortar stores, longer hours are a way to fight the battle for market share. Retail analysts say physical stores have an advantage over the cyber competition: When they promote an item by selling it at a loss, it draws shoppers who will buy other things. For online stores, shoppers stop with the single purchase.
Big-box stores such as Walmart and Toys R Us led the Black Friday creep into Thanksgiving by opening at 8 p.m. Thursday, despite criticism from some employees and patrons.
It’s not known how many people took advantage of the Thursday hours, but a survey by the International Council of Shopping Centers and Goldman Sachs found 17 percent of 1,000 people questioned would do so.
As for Black Friday, 33 percent in the survey said they would shop that day, vs. 34 percent last year.
There was early evidence that the Thursday rush reduced business on Friday. Deloitte retail analyst Ramesh Swamy told Reuters, “People seemed to be shopping quite a bit, although in talking to mall management, it seemed that traffic was not as busy as last year.”
http://www.suntimes.com/news/16582784-4 … nking.html
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Sat Nov 24, 2012 2:39 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Business • Black Friday grows longer but impact appears to be shrinkin
Black Friday grows longer but impact appears to be shrinking
BY DAVID ROEDER Business Reporter/droeder@suntimes.com November 24, 2012
Yes, Black Friday shopping is now woven into the national culture and it’s overshadowing the relatively relaxed Thanksgiving holiday. But just as the phenomenon seems to get larger, it’s strangely getting smaller.
For all the reports of people lined up in the chill and jostling each other for goods that remained safely on the shelves just a couple days ago, Black Friday’s role in the year-end shopping blowout is slipping.
The National Retail Federation projects that 147 million people will shop from Friday through Sunday, down from 152 million people from last year’s three-day Thanksgiving weekend.
The average shopper this weekend was still expected to spend slightly more money compared with last year, by the federation’s reckoning. It also estimates that total retail sales for November and December will be $586.1 billion, up 4.1 percent from a year ago.
So spending is still there, but retailers have expanded the season for getting it. At Sears and Kmart stores, for example, a “shop your way” online program began offering extras rewards last Sunday for people who order online and pick up the item at a store, said Ron Boire, executive vice president at Sears Holdings Corp.
Boire said the promotion spread out the holiday rush at its stores throughout the week. Sears stores still opened at 8 p.m. Thursday to catch the early birds. By Friday the aisles were busy but not frantic, Boire said.
“It was a different kind of shopper, more relaxed,” he said. But he added that “there’s no doubt that consumers are stressed out given the high levels of unemployment and, perhaps more importantly, underemployment.”
Also changing the retail landscape is technology. Each year, more people are accustomed to ordering online and using Internet tools to shop for the best deals.
Merchants stepped up their online promotions for the weekend and Cyber Monday, the term for the first Monday after Thanksgiving. That’s when an estimated 72 million people return to their work computer and use the generous bandwidths to order gifts, despite the cost in worker productivity.
A survey by BIGinsight found that 97 percent of online merchants planned promotions for sometime during Thanksgiving weekend vs. 90 percent last year. A record 85 percent said they have deals on Cyber Monday.
The incentives typically start with free shipping.
The retail federation has its own web site, CyberMonday.com, as a clearinghouse for the offers. The site also will offer, in Groupon-like fashion, “deals of the hour” through Monday.
For the brick-and-mortar stores, longer hours are a way to fight the battle for market share. Retail analysts say physical stores have an advantage over the cyber competition: When they promote an item by selling it at a loss, it draws shoppers who will buy other things. For online stores, shoppers stop with the single purchase.
Big-box stores such as Walmart and Toys R Us led the Black Friday creep into Thanksgiving by opening at 8 p.m. Thursday, despite criticism from some employees and patrons.
It’s not known how many people took advantage of the Thursday hours, but a survey by the International Council of Shopping Centers and Goldman Sachs found 17 percent of 1,000 people questioned would do so.
As for Black Friday, 33 percent in the survey said they would shop that day, vs. 34 percent last year.
There was early evidence that the Thursday rush reduced business on Friday. Deloitte retail analyst Ramesh Swamy told Reuters, “People seemed to be shopping quite a bit, although in talking to mall management, it seemed that traffic was not as busy as last year.”
http://www.suntimes.com/news/16582784-4 … nking.html
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Sat Nov 24, 2012 2:39 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
International News • Switzerland Grows into Global Commodities Hub
The Attraction of Tax Breaks
Switzerland Grows into Global Commodities Hub
By Alexander Jung and Anne Seith
Bloomberg via Getty Images
Switzerland has quietly developed into the global center of commodities trading. Critics say the industry’s business practices in countries such as Congo and Zambia are immoral, and that it puts profits before people.
Ivan Glasenberg usually wakes up at 5 a.m., goes jogging or swimming and then goes to the office, not returning home until late in the evening. The taxes he pays make up two-thirds of total tax revenues in his town. His angular villa on a side street, with its brown coat of paint, blends well with its surroundings in Rüschlikon, an idyllic, picture-postcard little town on Lake Zurich. Glasenberg, CEO of the commodities giant Glencore, is actually a pleasant neighbor.
He is not the town’s only wealthy resident. Rüschlikon, which has 5,200 inhabitants, is also home to a number of executives, bankers and even a Greek ship owner. But the Glencore CEO multiplied his assets last year through the initial public offering of his company, of which he owns 16 percent. As a result, Glasenberg paid the equivalent of €290 million ($361 million) in taxes to the town and the surrounding canton.
After receiving this enormous windfall from its new resident, who was born in South Africa, Rüschlikon was able to reduce its already low income tax rate by several percentage points. But not all residents are happy about the decrease. "While we think about what to do with the money, people in other places are dying a miserable death," says village pastor Josip Kneževi bluntly.
Kneževi, a native Croat with a gray ponytail, is the proud owner of a red BMW R80 motorcycle and doesn’t really have any objection to a little prosperity. Still he signed the "Solidarity Rüschlikon" initiative aimed at preventing the massive tax reductions in the town. Instead he advocated using tax revenue to create a sort of solidarity supplement for development aid. Kneževi calls Glencore’s business dealings "immoral" and says that the town shouldn’t simply accept a portion of the profits.
"All great cultures reached a point at which they became perverse and then collapsed," the theologian says darkly. He isn’t just talking about the little town of Rüschlikon.
Sanctuary for Kleptocrats and Tax Evaders
Ironically Switzerland, a country with few natural resources to speak of, has grown into one of the most important centers for the global commodities industry in recent years. In Switzerland, companies encounter optimal tax conditions, sympathetic officials and an army of lawyers and bankers who specialize in the needs of the deep-pocketed industry.
Companies like Glencore now process 15 to 25 percent of the global trade in ore, copper, oil and agricultural products from their headquarters in Switzerland. Net revenues in the industry have increased by a factor of 15 between 1998 and 2010.
Proponents see the new booming sector as a replacement of sorts for the banking industry, which hasn’t been flourishing for some time, but critics are worried about their country’s already damaged reputation. "For decades, our image was that of a worldwide sanctuary for kleptocrats and tax evaders. Now we are in the process of cleaning that up, and already we are pursuing the next dubious business model," says criminal law professor Marc Pieth, chairman of the Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Glencore, one of the world’s largest trading companies of its type, is headquartered only a few kilometers from Rüschlikon, in a town called Baar, which prides itself on being "one of the lowest-tax municipalities in Switzerland." From his office there, CEO Glasenberg runs a corporate empire, active in 40 countries, with a large network of subsidiaries and partnerships around the world. In 2010, the company controlled about 60 percent of the international zinc trade, 50 percent of the accessible copper and 45 percent of the lead market. In 2011, Glencore’s had profits of $4.3 billion, with annual sales increasing from $21 billion in 1998 to $186 billion.
Glasenberg wants the company to continuing growing. He is currently working on a merger with mine operator Xstrata, which has its headquarters not far from his office. If the plan succeeds, the resulting entity will be a giant with a market value of $80 billion, making it more valuable than Goldman Sachs or Volkswagen.
Despite its massive wealth companies like Glencore are still relatively unknown, because the industry is more secretive than almost any other.
As Safe as Disneyland
Largely unnoticed by the world public, Geneva, the sophisticated metropolis in the French-speaking part of Switzerland, has become one of the most important global trading centers for wheat, coffee, sugar and cotton. The city has even replaced London as the most important hub for the worldwide crude oil business.
About every third barrel (159 liters) of crude oil sold anywhere in the world passes through the books of one of the trading companies headquartered in Geneva. The two most important companies are Vitol and Trafigura. Their employees work in the kinds of unadorned office buildings found throughout the Canton of Zug. Together, the two Geneva-based companies achieved sales of about $400 billion in 2011, which is roughly equal to the gross domestic product of Austria.
In principle, the traders act like logistics companies, moving the commodity from its production location to where it is needed. To that end, they maintain port terminals, warehouses and charter tankers that they direct across the world’s oceans, making it a cost-intensive business.
Vitol, for example, has more than 200 ships in operation in the world’s oceans at all times. At the current oil price of about $100 a barrel, just one of these supertankers, which can transport about 2 million barrels, ties up close to $200 million.
Lenders like BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole and Credit Suisse, which specialize in this type of financing, maintain special commodities teams in their Geneva offices. They are joined by members of other professional groups: lawyers, insurers, ship owners, shippers, merchandise inspectors and a large number of consultants. Switzerland has great infrastructure, says Glencore CEO Glasenberg, who points out that his adopted country is also "as safe as Disneyland."
Favorable Tax Laws
The country has another decisive advantage for companies: favorable tax laws. Most commodities traders in Switzerland call themselves "mixed companies," which do more than 80 percent of their actual business abroad and, as a result, only pay taxes on a portion of profits. All told, the tax burden ranges from about 10 to 13 percent, depending on the canton, say officials with a major accounting firm. In Germany, the treasury demands almost three times as much.
Swiss companies usually have dozens of subsidiaries around the world, which they can use to combine the advantages of idyllic Switzerland with those in tax havens like Bermuda and the Netherlands Antilles, says Andreas Missbach, a tax expert with Berne Declaration, a Swiss non-governmental organization.
Missbach is one of the authors of the book "Commodities: Switzerland’s Most Dangerous Business," which is currently causing a stir in his country. The results of painstaking research all over the world, on issues like the working conditions of workers in Congolese mines and on cotton plantations in Uzbekistan, have triggered a heated debate over whether and how Switzerland can monitor the booming industry.
"Companies like Glencore push profits and costs back and forth within their corporate group, to places where they pay the lowest taxes possible," says Missbach. "Of course, this comes at the expense of poor countries."
Development Aid or Exploitation
Glencore operates large portions of its business in countries that are highly corrupt or have authoritarian regimes, like Equatorial Guinea, Kazakhstan and Congo. But for CEO Glasenberg, the company’s involvement in countries like these more closely resembles development aid than exploitation. "In Congo we have built football stadiums, bridges, hospitals in addition to investing billions of dollars in our mining business," he says. "We are doing good things in those countries."
But there is little recognition for these efforts. On the contrary, criminal law experts like Pieth are sharply critical of the industry. "Corruption is almost unavoidable in countries like Congo," he says. The Catholic development organization Fastenopfer accuses Glencore of buying copper for its furnaces in Congo, where children scrape the metal out of the dirt with their bare hands. Berne Declaration accuses Glencore of using a subsidiary to understate the profits from a copper mine in Zambia.
Glencore vehemently denies such accusations and issues lengthy statements in its defense. It claims its tax payments in Zambia, where it invested a lot of money and created thousands of jobs, were calculated correctly, and that the company does not profit from child labor. According to CEO Glasenberg, the company has even developed social and environmental standards that are applicable worldwide and are often stricter than local laws.
The former professional race walker with thinning, dark brown hair and a defiant gaze, is appearing in public more frequently to polish the image of his industry, amid growing calls for stricter regulation of him and his counterparts in the industry. The European Union is emphatically fighting the generous tax benefits for "mixed companies."
A number of legal scholars advocate the idea of taking action in Switzerland against possible crimes committed by commodities companies abroad. Until now, this has only been possible with serious crimes like sexual offences that Swiss citizens commit abroad.
Whether all the uproar will actually lead to new laws remains questionable. In Rüschlikon, the efforts of industry critics initially failed. The municipal assembly rejected Solidarity Rüschlikon’s idea of a solidarity surcharge for development.
Village Pastor Kneževi still looks distressed today when he talks about that day in December. The "power of money" prevailed once again, he says.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/bus … 41287.html
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:50 am
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Agriculture • NZ dairy herd grows 10 times as fast as human one
UK, 14th May 2012, by Agrimoney.com
NZ dairy herd grows 10 times as fast as human one
New Zealand’s dairy cattle population is increasing nearly 10 times as fast as it human one, in part at the expense of sheep farming, and creating a ready market for feed grains.
Official data on Monday showed New Zealand’s human residents increasing at the rate of about 2,300 a month in the year to the end of March, the slowest pace in percentage terms in more than a decade and fuelled by emigration and the impact on the death rate of an ageing population.
However, the dairy herd is rising at the rate of nearly 2,200 a month, topped 6m head in the year to last June, outnumbering humans by 1.4:1, Statistics New Zealand data showed.
"More cattle were kept for milk production and future replacement – a result of the high milk solid payout and strong international demand for dairy products," SNZ said.
Fonterra, New Zealand’s biggest company, and the world’s top dairy exporter, paid its farmer members a record NZ$8.25 per kilogramme of milk solid in the year to last July, equivalent to about an average of NZ$1m ($780,000) apiece.
Cattle vs sheep
The expansion in New Zealand’s dairy industry has come in part at the expense of other livestock sectors, such as sheep, for which the country was once renowned.
The country’s sheep population fell by 1.4m head, or 4.3%, in the year to last June to 31.1m head, down from well over 50m head two decades before.
The decline in sheep numbers was led by South Island, some parts of which were "most severely affected by snow and storms during the 2010 spring lambing season", SNZ said.
However, South Island is also accounting for an increasing proportion of the dairy herd, of 31%, compared with 23% in 2006.
Food vs feed
The data also showed a continuation in a long-term decline in beef cattle numbers, down 102,000 at 3.8m head.
"Over half the decrease came from a reduced number of breeding cows and heifers, as a result of increased slaughtering, SNZ said.
Deer numbers fell too, by 34,000 to 1.1m head, as slaughter rose "due to farmers receiving continuing high prices for venison".
However, the harvested area of corn rose by 5.2%, and of barley by 24%, as demand from largely-dairy livestock farmers encouraged higher prices.
"In 2011, more grain was grown for stock feed," SNZ said, noting that barley had paid "well relative to other main crops".
Indeed, arable farmers showed less interest in feeding the country’s human population. "The area for bread and milling [grain] decreased."
http://www.agrimoney.com/news/nz-dairy- … -4515.html
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Mon May 14, 2012 9:24 am
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/quotes_7a.gif)
