[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

late

American • Goznell Found Guilty Of Murdering Three Infants In Late Term

Kermit Gosnell trial: Philadelphia abortion doctor guilty of murdering three infants in late-term abortions; cleared in 4th baby’s death
The jury will return Tuesday to hear evidence on whether Gosnell should get the death penalty.

YONG KIM / AP
Dr. Kermit Gosnell faces the possibility of the death penalty after he was found guilty of murdering infants in late-term abortions.

By: Reuters Published on Mon May 13 2013
r

PHILADELPHIA—A Philadelphia abortion doctor was found guilty Monday of first-degree murder and could face execution in the deaths of three babies who authorities say were delivered alive and then killed with scissors at his grimy clinic, in a case that became a flashpoint in America’s debate over abortion.
Dr. Kermit Gosnell, 72, was cleared in the death of a fourth baby, who prosecutors say let out a soft whimper before he snipped its neck.

Gosnell was also found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the drug-overdose death of a patient who had undergone an abortion.
The jury will return Tuesday to hear evidence on whether Gosnell should get the death penalty.
Former clinic employees testified that Gosnell routinely performed illegal late-term abortions past Pennsylvania’s 24-week limit, that he delivered babies who were still moving, whimpering or breathing, and that he and his assistants “snipped” the newborns’ spines, as he referred to it.
“Are you human?” prosecutor Ed Cameron snarled during closing arguments as Gosnell sat calmly at the defence table. “To med these women up and stick knives in the backs of babies?”
The grisly details came out more than two years ago during an investigation of prescription drug trafficking at Gosnell’s clinic in an impoverished section of West Philadelphia.
Authorities said the clinic was a foul-smelling “house of horrors” with bags and bottles of stored fetuses, including jars of severed feet, along with bloodstained furniture, dirty medical instruments, and cats roaming the premises.
Pennsylvania authorities had failed to conduct routine inspections of all of its abortion clinics for 15 years by the time Gosnell’s facility was raided and closed down. In the scandal’s aftermath, two top state health department officials were fired, and Pennsylvania imposed tougher rules for clinics.
Four former clinic employees have pleaded guilty to murder and four more to other charges. They include Gosnell’s wife, Pearl, a cosmetologist who helped perform abortions.
Both sides of the abortion divide seized on the case. Abortion foes said it exposed the true nature of abortion in all its disturbing detail. Abortion rights activists warned that Gosnell’s rogue practice foreshadows what poor and desperate young women could face if abortion is driven underground with more restrictive laws.
Midway through the six-week trial, anti-abortion activists accused the mainstream media of ignoring the case because it reflected badly on the abortion rights cause. Major news organizations denied the allegation, though a number promptly sent reporters to cover the trial.
After prosecutors rested their case, Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey Minehart threw out for lack of evidence three of seven murder counts involving aborted fetuses. That left the jury to weigh charges involving fetuses identified as Baby A, Baby C, Baby D and Baby E.
Prosecution experts said one was nearly 30 weeks along when it was aborted, and it was so big that Gosnell allegedly joked it could “walk to the bus.” A second fetus was said to be alive for some 20 minutes before a clinic worker snipped its neck. A third was born in a toilet and was moving before another clinic employee grabbed it and severed its spinal cord, according to testimony. Baby E let out a soft whimper before Gosnell cut its neck, the jury was told; Gosnell was acquitted in that baby’s death.
Gosnell’s attorney, Jack McMahon, argued that none of the fetuses was born alive and that any movements were posthumous twitching or spasms.
He also contended that the 2009 death of 41-year-old Karnamaya Mongar, a Bhutanese immigrant who had been given repeated doses of Demerol and other powerful drugs to sedate her and induce labour, was caused by unforeseen complications.
Gosnell did not testify, and his lawyer called no witnesses in his defence. But McMahon argued that the doctor provided desperate young woman with “a solution to their problems,” and he branded prosecutors “elitist” and “racist” for pursuing his client, who is black and whose patients were mostly poor minorities.
“We know why he was targeted,” McMahon said.
Prosecutors described Gosnell’s employees as nearly as desperate as the patients. Some had little or no medical training, and at least one was a teenager still in high school. One woman needed the work to support her children after her husband’s murder.
Gosnell still faces federal drug charges. Authorities said that he ranked third in the state for OxyContin prescriptions and that he left blank prescription pads at his office and let staff members make them out to cash-paying patients.
He performed thousands of abortions over a 30-year career. Authorities said the medical practice alone netted him about $1.8 million a year, much of it in cash. Authorities found $250,000 hidden in a bedroom when they searched his house. Gosnell also owned a beach home and several rental properties.
“He created an assembly line with no regard for these women whatsoever,” Cameron said. “And he made money doing that.”

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/ … tions.html

Statistics: Posted by yoda — Mon May 13, 2013 4:10 pm


View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com

American • 2014: TOO LATE TO LEAVE THE U.S.?

2014: TOO LATE TO LEAVE THE U.S.?

[Editor's Note: The following post is by TDV contributor, Wendy McElroy]

The Ex-PATRIOT Act lies like a coiled snake on a table in the U.S. Senate. The longer title of this unenacted bill from 2012 is the Expatriation Prevention by Abolishing Tax-Related Incentives for Offshore Tenancy Act. Its self-description is, "A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that persons renouncing citizenship for a substantial tax avoidance purpose shall be subject to tax and withholding on capital gains, to provide that such persons shall not be admissible to the United States, and for other purposes."

The Ex-PATRIOT Act seeks to impose a perpetual exit tax and a re-entry ban on “specified expatriates.” A specified expat is anyone with a net worth of at least $2 million or a tax liability averaging at least $148,000 over the last 5 years. A renunciation of citizenship would be automatically viewed as a tax dodge. The person would need to prove his innocence to the IRS to become exempt from a permanent and annual 30% tax on all earnings from U.S. investments. The net worth level at which the tax triggered would undoubtedly sink over time and, perhaps, quickly so.

(Even the Nazis were not so extreme. Until 1941, the third Reich used the Reichsfluchtsteuer (Reich Flight Tax) to charge emigrating Jews a one-time 25 percent exit tax. Schumer wants 30% in perpetuity.)

The Ex-PATRIOT Act would also ban “former citizens” from U.S. soil unless he received a waiver. The waiver requirements are to be determined at a later date. Current expats have no legal right to return, but they are rarely banned from doing so.

The Act was introduced in May 2012 by Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Finance. It is likely to pass in 2013.

THE LIKELIHOOD OF PASSAGE

Reason #1. When the Act emerged from the Democrat-dominated Senate, John Boehner – the Republican leader in the House of Representatives — was luke-warm. He would back the Act if it was “necessary,” he stated. But he asked, is this really necessary? Since then, the two parties have feuded bitterly over a budget bill, with the Republicans accused of serving millionaires at the expense of America. The mud stuck. Boehner caved; despite a vow to never do so, he allowed taxes on millionaires to rise.

If he opposes the Ex-PATRIOT Act, Republicans will be excoriated for pandering to jet-set tax evaders. Democrats will chortle with joy. In fact, they have already played the embarrassment card. A co-sponsor of the Act challenged Boehner through a press conference, “Washington needs to work together in a bipartisan manner. I request that you introduce the Ex-PATRIOT Act in the United States House of Representatives and call for an immediate vote on this important legislation.” The political dynamic favors passage of the Act in both the Senate and the House.

Reason #2. The average trapped American is resentful of expats…and, most especially, rich ones. As long as the rate of expatriation was small, it could be dismissed as an aberration. After all, who would flee from the land of the free? That was something Europeans did. But the annual rate of expatriation has been rising sharply since Obama’s first term (2009-2012). In 2008, 231 Americas went through the complex and expensive process of officially leaving. In 2009, 750 left; in 2010, 1534; in 2011, 1782. These are official numbers from the Taxpatriate Lists published by the IRS.

The real numbers would be much, much higher. Consider a series of Zogby International polls conducted between 2005 to 2007. The polls focused on households, not individuals, and excluded households in which any member went abroad as a part of work for the government or a private company. Zogby found that “1.6 million U.S. households had already determined to relocate abroad; an additional 1.8 million households were seriously considering such a move, while 7.7 million more were ‘somewhat seriously’ contemplating it.” Zogby concluded, “If the data collected in the seven polls…are fairly representative of the current decade, then, by a modest estimate, at least 3 million U.S. citizens a year are venturing abroad."

The polls were pre-Obama. If the post-Obama rate of household relocation tracks the Taxpatriate List rate, then household relocation increased more than eight-fold from 2008 to 2011. No one knows the real numbers but the “expat problem” is now too large to ignore.

[Editor's Note: If you would like to become part of this "problem"...then take this necessary step to free yourself from the increasing burden of belonging to the US...]

Reason #3. Even if the expat numbers remained small, Eduardo Saverin was a game-changer. On May 11, 2012, a Global Post headline announced, “Eduardo Saverin, Facebook co-founder, to renounce his US citizenship ahead of IPO.” Bloomberg estimated that Saverin might well save $67 million in taxes by renouncing prior to Facebook going public.

One week later, on May 17, Schumer announced the Ex-PATRIOT Act as a direct response to Saverin’s “outrage.” Even Boehner was politically compelled to denounce Saverin. Then Denise Rich – a prominent songwriter, socialite and political fundraiser – went expat for tax advantages. And, now, it is rock legend Tina Turner. The United States cannot permit mega-rich and famous people to make expatriation trendy, especially not for tax reasons.

Reason #4. The Ex-PATRIOT Act is another in what seems to be an irresistible juggernaut of repression against expatriates and Americans abroad.

Some of the totalitarian measures are well known, such as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. Others fly under the radar. For example, a provision was buried in an unrelated and 1676-paged Transportation Bill entitled “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act” (MAP21). Section 40304 allows the IRS to unilaterally revoke the American passport of anyone it believes "owes" $50,000 or more in taxes. There is no hearing or due process. The IRS can now prevent Americans from fleeing abroad by slamming shut the exit door. And that’s that.

Reason #5. Expats and unobtrusive Americans abroad have no hand. Politicians do not care about exiles who do not vote or about people who expose “America, the beautiful” as a lie. Politicians need to demonize them as being greedy, unpatriotic, and thieving elitists. By accusing expats of their own sins, the politicians create a scapegoat.

CONCLUSION

As it is currently written, the Ex-PATRIOT Act would not be retroactive in its tax provisions. But 2013 may be the last year to use the old tax code. If you are thinking about leaving the U.S., then do it NOW! The legislative pipeline in Congress has been clogged during much of 2012. Do not wait until measures like the Ex-PATRIOT Act or another Section 40304 pass the blockade and land directly into your life. 2014 may be too late.

Wendy McElroy is a renowned individualist anarchist and individualist feminist. She was a co-founder along with Carl Watner and George H. Smith of The Voluntaryist in 1982, and is the author/editor of twelve books, the latest of which is "The Art of Being Free". Follow her work at http://www.wendymcelroy.com.

http://dollarvigilante.com/blog/2013/1/ … he-us.html

Statistics: Posted by yoda — Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:42 am


View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com

International News • Trains to fog-hit Delhi running up to 2 days late

Trains to fog-hit Delhi running up to 2 days late
By Dwaipayan Ghosh, TNN | Jan 8, 2013, 02.20 AM IST

The schedules of thousands of passengers have been thrown totally off-track across fog-hit north India and beyond.

NEW DELHI: Sudhir Kumar was to appear for a job interview in Delhi on Monday. To make sure he arrived well in time, the resident of Bhagalpur in Bihar had booked himself in a train that was to reach Delhi on Saturday. But the Bhagalpur Garib Rath that he boarded had not arrived in Delhi till Monday morning. The railway website said the train was 48 hours behind schedule.

Like Kumar, the schedules of thousands of passengers have been thrown totally off-track across fog-hit north India and beyond. The delays this season have been more severe then previous years, exposing the Railways’ inability to deal with the situation.

"I waited in the station with my wife and children for more than 20 hours before my train, Purvottar Sampark Kranti Express, finally left the New Delhi station… What’s really frustrating is that neither the rail enquiry service nor any official could give me updates on when the train would start," said Tarun Sharma, a passenger.

A hapless Railways is waiting for the weather to clear in the fog zone — a 700km stretch between Ghaziabad and Mughalsarai — for the situation to normalize.

On Monday, 16 express trains and another dozen passenger trains were cancelled. Despite that at least seven trains was delayed by over 20 hours and another 16 for more than 10 hours.

The Rewa-Anand Vihar Express was 33 hours late, the Porvortar Sampark Kranti Express by 26 hours, the West Bengal Samparkranti Express also by 26 hours and the Bihar Sampark Kranti by 30 hours. Sources in north central railway said shallow fog was setting in from as early as 10.30pm and in the Kanpur-Tundla stretch (which trains enter early morning in order to reach Delhi), it lifts only around 10.15am.

"It is an unusual situation," said a northern railway spokesperson, denying any lack of preparedness. "Everything is put up on enquiry number 139 and we are monitoring each train real time, through GPS. Every delay is put up on the notice board. We are ensuring none of the restrooms get too overcrowded in this challenging weather. We have placed teams led by mechanical and electrical engineers at all our stations and the station master controls the movements of empty coaches entering the washing line. We are readying trains for the return journey within five hours even as the minimum primary and secondary maintenance requires at least four to six hours,” said the spokesperson.

Railway employees deployed at the stations felt the failure of the fog safety device to take off has proved costly. The Railways’ preparation to run trains safely in foggy conditions depended on this device.

The GPS-based fog safe device though has failed to produce the desired results during trials in the past two years. The trials were carried out in trains in the Delhi-Ambala section last winter, which is known for its dense fog cover.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi … 932556.cms

Statistics: Posted by yoda — Mon Jan 07, 2013 11:23 pm


View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com

Gold and Silver • Sideways Precious Metals Prices Mean It’s Not Too Late

Sideways Precious Metals Prices Mean It’s Not Too Late

Written by Jeff Nielson
Tuesday, 27 March 2012
Throughout the history of our industrialized economies, gold and silver have typically represented between 5% and 10% of the average investor portfolio – or roughly 5% to 10% of their wealth. Note that historically this ratio has typically risen in times of financial turmoil, crisis, or simply any time of high inflation.

Today, despite the price of gold having surged in price by well over 500% from its absolute low, despite the price of silver having surged more than 800% off of its absolute low; gold and silver still represent little more than 1% of the wealth of the average individual. The gross under-ownership of this historic “safe haven” is taking place at a time when Western markets, financial systems, and their entire economies have never been in a greater state of crisis.

Already, these debt-saturated dominoes have begun effectively declaring national bankruptcy. This is the only way to describe the 75% default on Greek government debt and the wholesale liquidation of government-owned assets. This only increases the leverage (and the strain) on the bankers’ $1+ quadrillion derivatives market.

The derivatives market is a totally unregulated casino, operated by Western banking Oligarchs. It is nothing but a collection of bets on the world’s markets and economies. Indeed, one of the largest category of derivatives are credit default swaps – which had been banned for decades based upon U.S. anti-gambling statutes.

With this insanely leveraged casino having swollen to a size equal to more than 20 times total, global GDP; it is only a question of “when” not if this paper Ponzi-scheme will implode. The amounts are so huge that a “bail-out” isn’t even theoretically possible. When this implosion occurs, the Western financial system is 100% certain to be vaporized (and most likely all Western paper currencies).

Meanwhile, the same cabal of bankers is printing-up their paper money at the most reckless rates in history, which is the only reason they have been able to delay the implosion of their paper house-of-cards this long. It is a matter of elementary economics and arithmetic that if you print currency at a rate in excess of economic growth that the value of that paper must decline.

Hence, an ounce of gold which used to be priced at under $300/oz is now over $1600 (and had been much higher). An ounce of silver which used to be sold for less than $4/oz is now close to $32/oz (and had been much higher). A barrel of oil which was priced at $30/barrel a few years ago is priced at over $100/barrel today – despite energy analysts continuing to talk about a glut of current supplies/inventories.

A loaf of bread which cost $2 only a few years ago costs $4 today. A dozen eggs which used to be under $2 is now over $3. A pound of ground beef which used to cost about $2/lb is now about $4/lb. The quality of none of these goods has improved. Indeed, the disease-ridden livestock which produce much of our food are arguably getting more and more inferior. Rather, it is the paper which is plummeting in value – despite our dishonest governments foisting their “low inflation” lies upon us.

The paper-printing continues to increase exponentially. Every time you hear the phrase “bail-out” understand that none of our governments has any money, and that all that “bail-out” means is printing-up much, much more paper. Thus the inflation which has already ravaged our purchasing power has only just begun.

Throughout the thousand-year history of paper money, there has only been one certain means of protecting one’s self from the depravity of bankers: precious metals. Thus, the greatest fear of myself and the growing community of precious metals commentators is that we would be too late in alerting the general public to the absolute, imperative need to convert their paper to real money – and as quickly as possible.

It’s easy to recapture this sense of urgency by going back exactly one year in time. The price of gold was over $1400/oz, and had risen by approximately 30% over the year preceding that. The price of silver was actually about $4.50/oz higher in price then, and had risen by over 100% over the preceding year.

For all the reasons listed above, along with the strongest supply/demand fundamentals for any class of commodities on our planet; it was (and is) 100% certain that gold and silver prices can only go much higher over the longer term – until some time past when the bankers have finished the inevitable self-destruction of their entire, paper empire.

For lack of a better term, let’s describe what has happened over the past year as “sideways” trading in gold and silver. The price of gold is up a little less than 20%; the price of silver is down a little less than 15%. In statistical terms, given the extreme volatility of these markets these relatively small price movements can only be discussed in those terms.

Now let us pose a hypothetical scenario. Instead of the bankers having staged a massive (and totally artificial) operation one year ago to temporarily cap the price of silver at just below $50/oz; let us assume that the price of silver had simply continued on its inevitable upward trajectory – and was now priced at over $100/oz.

Hypothetically, let us also assume that instead of the price of gold having been temporarily capped last summer at just under $2,000/oz that it had also simply resumed this 10+ year bull-run, and was now somewhere north of $2,500/oz. What would the investing public be lamenting as they sat there with only 1% of their own wealth in precious metals?

The answer is obvious. They would all be wishing they had “one last chance” to jump on the bandwagon before prices had run up so high that their ability to shelter their wealth had been greatly diminished.

We can therefore state unequivocally that what the bankers have done in their last-ditch defense of yet more obsolete “technical barriers” in these markets has been to provide ordinary investors who have missed out on this golden (or silver) opportunity with a final chance to make up for lost time – and at sale prices.

As stated previously, the fundamentals for gold and silver clearly dictate much higher prices. However, many potential investors have (ironically) been frightened away by this manipulation of these markets and the tremendous volatility which has accompanied them. Their fear is that the anti-bullion banking cabal is somehow omnipotent – and can suppress prices indefinitely.

The rebuttal to that thinking is simple and absolute. If the bankers retained that sort of control over these markets then silver would still be priced at under $4/oz, and gold would still be priced at under $300/oz. More than ten years of rising prices in defiance of these paper-pushers is absolute, empirical proof that the bankers can only restrain these markets over temporary intervals.

The other way to describe that dynamic is as follows: the current “sale” on gold and silver must end soon. Rational investors need to ask themselves whether they would rather have purchased their silver at its recent high (over $49/oz) or at under $33/oz. They need to ask themselves whether they would have rather purchased their gold at its recent high (just under $2,000/oz), or at under $1,700/oz.

With governments continually talking about “bail-outs” out of one side of their mouths, and “competitive devaluation” out of the other side; it is as certain as night follows day that the collapse in the value of our paper money can only accelerate. Historically, every previous experiment in these paper, fiat currencies has ended with the paper going to zero, or simply being removed from circulation (at some near-zero price).

The same group of bankers who are certain to completely destroy the value of the scraps of paper in our wallets are ironically the same individuals giving the sheep one last chance to protect themselves from the wolves, by converting their doomed paper into the 5,000-year safe haven represented by gold and silver.

Investors now have the rarest of opportunities in our markets: a clear warning and a clear buying opportunity. Those who miss out on this window will have no one to blame but themselves.

http://www.bullionbullscanada.com/

Statistics: Posted by yoda — Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:30 am


View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com

American • Mortgage delinquencies rose in late 2011

By Nancy Rivera Brooks
February 14, 2012, 2:31 p.m.
More people were late with their home-loan payments in the last three months of 2011, the second quarter in a row that defaults increased.

Credit data giant TransUnion said serious mortgage delinquencies, loans on which borrowers were at least 60 days behind on payments, rose to 6.01% in the fourth quarter from 5.88% in the previous quarter.

The increases in those two quarters followed nearly two years of decline.

"To see that, quarter over quarter, fewer homeowners were able to make their mortgage payments is not welcome news," said Tim Martin, group vice president of U.S. housing in TransUnion’s financial services business unit.

Martin said seasonal factors were partly responsible for the increase “perhaps explained by borrowers balancing holiday spending versus debt payments.” In addition, falling housing prices exacerbated negative equity, where homeowners owe more than their houses are worth, while high unemployment and reduced income “can affect borrowers’ ability and willingness to pay their mortgages,” he said.

Delinquencies were down compared with the fourth quarter of 2010, when the rate was 6.41%.

“While it is certainly good to see the rate dropping, at this pace it will take a very long time for mortgage delinquencies to get back to normal," Martin said.

California’s delinquency rate was 7.14%, ranking fifth among states after Florida (14.27%), Nevada (12.08%), New Jersey (8.32%) and Arizona (7.5%).

TransUnion said mortgage delinquencies probably will increase for the next quarter or two “as some consumers are not able to, or decide not to, repay their mortgage debt obligations in light of the uncertain economic outlook.”
http://www.latimes.com/business/money/l … 0457.story

Statistics: Posted by yoda — Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:26 pm


View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com