Religion • Lawsuit Launched Against Former Lethbridge Pastor
Half-billion dollar lawsuit launched by investors
Former Lethbridge pastor faces legal action
BY JASON VAN RASSEL, CALGARY HERALD APRIL 4, 2013
“Most of these people are in the nature of mom-and-pop retail investors,” lawyer Blair Yorke-Slader of Bennett Jones LLP in Calgary said in an interview.
Investors have launched a class-action lawsuit seeking to recover $500 million they put into a series of beleaguered real estate companies and related ventures promoted by a former Lethbridge pastor.
A statement of claim filed in Court of Queen’s Bench on Wednesday alleges hundreds of people invested their savings in a scheme that improperly siphoned millions of dollars to Ronald James Aitkens and seven other people named in the suit.
“Most of these people are in the nature of mom-and-pop retail investors,” lawyer Blair Yorke-Slader of Bennett Jones LLP in Calgary said in an interview.
The suit alleges Aitkens created a series of entities called the Harvest Group of Companies, which raised $500 million for 16 ventures in real estate development, resource development and financial investment since 2001.
However, the suit claims none of the projects were viable; it alleges they were bait used to solicit money from investors that wound up in the pockets of Aitken and other Harvest Group principals.
“Each (project) was merely a shell, sham or captive company formed and/or incorporated with the purpose of obscuring this common purpose and organization,” reads the statement of claim.
“Although ostensibly in the business of providing legitimate real estate investments and developments, the Harvest Group of Companies was really in the business of improperly enriching the personal defendants.”
Aitken’s lawyer couldn’t be reached for comment on the lawsuit’s claims, which haven’t been proven in court.
The statement of claim names 11 plaintiffs who have stepped forward on behalf of hundreds of investors allegedly victimized by the defendants.
The precise number of investors eligible to join the suit isn’t yet known.
The suit said Harvest raised its money with a network of agents who sold shares and bonds in its ventures, often through word-of-mouth and free seminars.
The agents themselves were misled into providing false information to investors by the defendants, the suit alleges.
Although the plaintiffs don’t claim to know the exact role each of the seven defendants allegedly played, the suit describes Aitkens as the “directing or controlling mind” of the companies involved.
“Aitkens personally moved the scheme forward, made misrepresentations as described above to the investors and received benefit from investors’ funds. Aitkens was the ‘face’ of the Harvest Group of Companies and of the investment scheme,” the statement of claim said.
The suit claims the defendants enriched themselves mainly through “nonsensical management fees” and by transferring investors’ money out of the projects and into separate, but related, companies they also controlled.
In the case of a proposed industrial park in the town of Millet, south of Edmonton, the defendants raised $35 million from investors.
The suit alleges $22.7 million was used to buy the land “at an inflated and improvident value” from another Harvest Group company.
The defendants “improperly paid themselves” $9.1 million in management fees and made $2 million in payments to “affiliated entities and unknown parties,” according to the statement of claim.
Yet despite raising $35 million in capital, “few if any development activities have taken place with respect to the Railside Industrial Park project,” the claim said.
Some of the other projects Harvest raised money for include an office complex in downtown Calgary, as well as residential developments in southwest Calgary, Airdrie and Rocky View County.
The suit alleges not only have the projects never been built, investors’ bonds were never redeemed either.
Investors also put money into a Harvest Group company, Foundation Mortgage, that claimed to offer financing to other real estate development companies.
The suit alleges the money was used instead to make improper loans to other Harvest Group ventures.
“By either fraudulent design or extraordinary incompetence, the defendants, or certain of them, thereby ensured that bondholders would never be repaid,” the claim says.
Initially, some Foundation bondholders did receive a return on their investment — but the suit claims they were paid with money improperly taken from elsewhere.
“In truth, (Foundation) paid investors with money from other investors, sometimes even from other projects, in a Ponzi-like fashion,” the suit says.
The suit must be certified by a judge before it can proceed.
In addition to $500 million restitution, the suit also seeks unspecified damages for breach of contract, misrepresentation, breach of trust, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and other alleged torts.
The suit also seeks a freeze on the defendants’ assets, as well as the appointment of a receiver or supervisor to oversee the sale of the real estate held by the Harvest companies with any proceeds going to the plaintiffs.
The case is scheduled to be heard in Calgary.
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/alber … story.html
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:14 am
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
If Oklahoma Wins Lawsuit, ‘The Whole Structure’ of ObamaCare ‘Starts to Fall Apart’
By Michael F. Cannon
Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt has filed a lawsuit challenging the Internal Revenue Service’s unlawful attempt to impose ObamaCare’s taxes on exempt employers and individuals. (Jonathan Adler and I plumb this issue in our forthcoming Health Matrix article, “Taxation Without Representation: The Illegal IRS Rule to Expand Tax Credits Under the PPACA.”)
An article in the current issue of Business Insurance cites a couple of experts on the potential impact of the lawsuit:
While the ramifications of the suit pending in the U.S. District Court in Muskogee, Okla., are huge, the challenge brought last month has gotten little attention…
What is clear is that the outcome of the lawsuit could be crucial for the future of the health care reform law, observers said.
If premium subsidies are not available in federally established exchanges, “No one would go to those exchanges. The whole structure created by the health care reform law starts to fall apart,” said Gretchen Young, senior vice president-health policy at the ERISA Industry Committee in Washington.
“The health care reform law would become a meaningless law,” added Chantel Sheaks, a principal with Buck Consultants L.L.C. in Washington.
If Oklahoma Wins Lawsuit, ‘The Whole Structure’ of ObamaCare ‘Starts to Fall Apart’ is a post from Cato @ Liberty – Cato Institute Blog
View full post on Cato @ Liberty
Firearms • Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry’s Family Files Lawsuit again
The family of murdered Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry has filed a $25-million lawsuit against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, claiming "negligence" and "a violation of ATF’s own policies and procedures" resulting in the death of their son.
A separate lawsuit against The Lone Wolf Trading Company stated that "but for defendants’ negligent and illegal sales … Brian Terry would not have been murdered."
Terry was killed when his unit was ambushed near the Arizona-Mexico border on the night of December 14, 2010. Two AK-47s found at the scene were part of an ATF gun-walking operation allowing the illegal purchase of weapons by straw buyers, who then sold them to a Mexican drug cartel.
Interviewed by Fox News in November, Terry’s mother expressed the general feeling of anyone now familiar with Fast and Furious.
If they never let the guns walk, maybe Brian would not have been out that day[.] … I just can’t believe our own government came up with a program like this that [let] innocent people get killed."
Attorney General Eric "My People" Holder, whose Department of Justice oversees the ATF, has claimed for over a year that he knew nothing about the logic-defying, deadly, and secretive program known as Fast and Furious. President Obama has shielded Holder from charges of perjury, obstruction, and conspiracy.
In October Obama stated that he has "complete confidence" in his Attorney General.
He has been very aggressive in going after gunrunning and cash transactions that are going to these transnational drug cartels in Mexico. He’s indicated he was not aware of what was happening in Fast and Furious. Certainly I was not.
And I think both he and I would have been very unhappy if somebody had suggested that guns were allowed to pass through that could have been prevented by the United States of America.
Agent Terry’s family, Agent Zapata’s loved ones, the Mexican government, and the American people deserve the truth. Justice must be served. The family’s legal action gives us hope that the guilty will finally be held responsible. After all, no one is above the law.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/201 … z1lE10fy9M
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:00 am
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/quotes_7a.gif)