Gold and Silver • Embry: Panic In The Gold Market Creating Problems For Shorts
Embry: Panic In The Gold Market Creating Problems For Shorts
http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/ … horts.html
On the heels of Jim Sinclair telling KWN that a full-blown panic has developed in the financial world with people wanting to know where their gold is, today John Embry spoke with King World News about this explosive situation and how he believes it will unfold. Below is what Embry, who is chief investment strategist at Sprott Asset Management, had to say in his interview:
Embry: “There was a fascinating study done by Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart which stated that once an economy gets to 90% government funded debt as a percentage of GDP, its growth rate slows dramatically. This was one of the underpinnings of the austerity movement.
Well, now they’ve come out and done an about face and said that model was all wrong. This is indicative of the fact they (central planners) realize if that if they don’t go to the printing press immediately, this whole thing is going to collapse….
“I think that is wildly bullish for gold. It’s just another signal that the central planners realize the only way to sustain this is by coming up with some theory that says it is OK to have more debt and print more money.
Logic dictates that if you get beyond a certain percentage of debt in your system, you’ve got a problem with growth going forward. I don’t think it’s important whether that level is 90% debt/GDP or 95%. But I think Rogoff and Reinhart’s theory is totally accurate, and the fact that they are trying to dispute it is just proof positive that they are desperate to end any talk of austerity and really get the serious money printing going.”
Embry also discussed individuals not being able to access their gold: “A year ago Egon von Greyerz was reporting that clients of his went to their respective banks to try to get their allocated gold in order to transfer it to his company GoldSwitzerland. In those instances they got it, but the wait was incredibly lengthy, and the physical gold was actually minted after they requested it. Well, if it was really allocated it would have been there.
Now we have this recent interview on KWN with Jim Sinclair discussing the fact that his good friend can’t get his gold out of a major Swiss bank. This gets back to the tip of the iceberg when the Dutch Bank ABN AMRO came out and literally said that if you have allocated gold with us, you can’t have it.
That, to me, is a default, and it gets back to what Jim Sinclair related when one of his friends went to a Swiss bank and couldn’t get his allocated gold. I mean that’s preposterous. If it’s allocated it should be there, but it’s clearly not there. I think this is the beginning of the end of the massive Ponzi scheme in paper gold. I have been talking about this for some time, and it will have an enormous impact on future gold and silver prices.
When it becomes widely known that all of the people who think they own gold in fact don’t own gold, that it’s been hypothecated and re-hypothecated so many times that there are 100 claims for every single ounce of physical gold, that is when the prices of gold and silver will really go berserk to the upside, and at that point the shorts will have serious problems.”
Statistics: Posted by DIGGER DAN — Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:55 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Gold and Silver • Maguire – Elaborates On The LBMA Default & Ensuing Panic
Maguire – Elaborates On The LBMA Default & Ensuing Panic
http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/ … Panic.html
Today whistleblower Andrew Maguire spoke with King World News, providing even more details by elaborating on the events surrounding the LBMA default. Maguire, who recently appeared in the extraordinary CBC production titled, “The Secret World of Gold,” also told KWN about the ensuing panic which has taken place in the aftermath of the LBMA default. Maguire described entities as “panicking.” Below is what Maguire had to say in part II of his remarkable and exclusive interview.
Eric King: “Inside that piece (“The Secret World of Gold”) you talked about gold leasing and the mechanics of that. Jim Sinclair wanted me to bring that up to you, the gold leasing, the mechanics of it, can you talk about that?”
Maguire: “We did a piece on King World News about it, about the LBMA bullion bank default. Stepping back, how did they get to such a mismatched (trading) position where they had so little gold and silver in their inventory to be able to back up people coming and asking for their gold and silver? They never anticipated that this would happen….
“But what had happened was, over the years, basically what you would do is you would sell gold, sell silver, financed almost for nothing, take that money and invest it. Then, obviously incentive was there because it had built up to such a large (short) position, they were so over-collateralized, that it was important to defend the price (of gold and silver) from rising because they didn’t actually have the physical.
What’s happened now is they are in a position where that leased gold is being asked for and they don’t have it. I know of a very large client who actually turned up for his bullion, was refused his bullion, and told he would be settled in cash. I felt I should go public with that (on KWN).
…(ABN AMRO) really was the tip of the iceberg. What happened was that we saw that first bullion bank create the first visible default of the LBMA fractional reserve system. I hear of other clients who are now panicking, and what happens? You get an official intervention. That’s what it (the takedown in gold and silver) was all about.”
Eric King: “Andrew, you were getting contacted by people all over the world after KWN did the interview with you regarding the LBMA default situation.”
Maguire: “I must say I had some really distressed emails. What they were asking is, ‘What should I do?’ All I could say to them is, ‘If I had physical stored in any bullion bank related warehouse, whether it be COMEX or LBMA, I would remove it right now.’
We all know that ‘default’ will not be called a ‘default.’ It will be settled with cash. I do not believe for a minute that the Fed can’t print a few billion (dollars), whatever it costs, to bail out the bullion banks for cash. Why wouldn’t they just bail them out with cash? It’s just an electronic keystroke. People will be sitting on the sidelines and they will not get any physical (gold).”
Maguire also added: “It’s been several years since I’ve taken any delivery from the COMEX, or any of my clients have. But I do remember on those prior occasions it was already difficult to get your physical out.
Arranging to actually have the audacity to back up a Brinks truck to the COMEX warehouse door, it just incurred every defensive tactic you can imagine. There were unreturned phone calls. There were questions as to, ‘Why do you want this physical?’
That was a few years ago, so just imagine how many more obstacles there are now. And obviously we are at the point of a critical default unfolding, so I would think think it’s going to be difficult to get your physical out now.”
Statistics: Posted by DIGGER DAN — Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:50 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Elite Panic
Jim Harper
Prior to the bombing and manhunt in Boston last week, Bruce Schneier pointed to an interesting interview with Rebecca Solnit, author of the book: A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster. She talks of a concept called elite panic.
The term “elite panic” was coined by Caron Chess and Lee Clarke of Rutgers. From the beginning of the field in the 1950s to the present, the major sociologists of disaster — Charles Fritz, Enrico Quarantelli, Kathleen Tierney, and Lee Clarke — proceeding in the most cautious, methodical, and clearly attempting-to-be-politically-neutral way of social scientists, arrived via their research at this enormous confidence in human nature and deep critique of institutional authority. It’s quite remarkable.
Summarizing her research, Soltis found a portrait elites paint of the public, to which they respond in times of crisis:
Part of the stereotypical image is that we’re either wolves or we’re sheep. We’re either devouring babies raw and tearing up grandmothers with our bare hands, or we’re helpless and we panic and mill around like idiots in need of Charlton Heston men in uniforms with badges to lead us. I think we’re neither, and the evidence bears that out.
There’s no denying the importance and value of investigating and capturing the perpetrators of the bombing, and I do not do so here, but elite panic seems to have been at play in Boston.
The lockdown—technically voluntary, but tell that to the guy in the tank (HT: Bovard)—treated the public variously as suspects, sources of interference, or targets for display of governmental authority.
Who are the elites? How does their panic manifest itself? “Elite panic” is not a tight enough concept to declare affirmatively that Boston is its examplar, but the concept is worth having in mind. The resources and resourcefulness of civil society are great and entirely accessible in times of peril. They should not be pushed aside at these times—certainly not at the business end of a gun.
View full post on Cato @ Liberty
Gold and Silver • Gold Panic!?!
Gold Panic!?!
Adam Hamilton
Archives
Apr 19, 2013
Holy cow, not even the most vociferous gold bears saw that one coming! Gold just suffered what can only be described as a panic. This metal plummeted so fast that its price surrendered a staggering 1/7th of its value in just two trading days! This blistering decline was so extreme it even dragged the general stock markets down with it. Shell-shocked gold investors are nervously wondering what to make of it.
The gold panic certainly caught me unaware, even after a dozen years of relentless study and very profitable trading of this secular gold bull. We were and are heavily deployed in dirt-cheap gold stocks in light of gold’s incredibly bullish technicals and sentiment. Seeing one of gold’s fastest selloffs ever wasn’t even in the probability space, it should have been effectively impossible. Yet it still happened.
That’s the problem with panics, they are so extraordinarily rare that they can’t be predicted. 2008′s crazy stock panic was the first true panic in 101 years, since 1907. The last stock selloff that even approached panic-magnitude before that happened in late 1974. So these events are separated by several decades to a century, making them impossible to game. Not one in a hundred selloffs cascades into a panic.
Gold’s recent plunge was crash-like as well, but couldn’t have been a crash. While panics cascade from lows after long declines, crashes erupt from record highs after long rallies. Crashes, which are also ultra-rare, are only seen immediately after major multi-year bull runs where euphoria just drove a parabolic terminal ascent. That certainly doesn’t describe gold’s weak downward price action over the past 6 months or so.
Gold was already low and unloved leading into its incredibly improbable panic. On last Thursday’s close before the mayhem started, gold was already down 12.9% since its recent early-October interim high and 17.6% under its August 2011 bull high. This was very reminiscent of 2008′s stock markets where the SPX was already down 22.5% over nearly a year just before it would plummet 30.0% in a single month.
Panics are ultra-extreme sentiment events that cascade out of lows when bearishness is already high. They are epic superstorms of fear that roar in and suddenly grip traders’ hearts, driving outsized selling so crazy that it would be utterly impossible any other time. Gold plunged 4.7% last Friday, and another 9.6% on Monday! The kind of universal fear and selling pressure necessary to trigger that is staggering.
I’ve never seen anything like this gold panic, no one has. Our gold-price data goes back to 1969, an exceedingly-long 44-year span. Americans couldn’t even legally own gold bullion before late 1974 thanks to another tyrannical Democratic President! There have only been two other comparable selloffs in nearly a half century, in January 1980 after the last secular bull’s parabolic climax and February 1983.
That January 1980 event was actually a crash marking the end of the mighty secular gold bull of the 1970s. Gold plummeted 13.2% the day after its peak and 18.2% in the two days after. Realize gold was in a popular speculative mania then, drenched in euphoria. It had skyrocketed an astonishing 200.4% higher in just over 5 months, a far cry from its 12.9% decline in the 6 months leading into this panic.
Now that, a tripling in 5 months, is what a bubble looks like friends! I can’t believe the number of knuckleheads I’ve seen on CNBC this week who claimed gold was recently in a bubble so its massive selloff was justified. They obviously know nothing about gold and nothing about speculative manias, which strips all credibility from their weathervaney hyper-bearish outlook. Gold was weak pre-panic!
Naturally the sharpest gold selloff of our lifetimes after the post-bubble crash in January 1980 is going to wreak catastrophic technical damage. There’s no way a 13.8% two-day plummet isn’t going to leave a mark, no matter which gold chart you are looking at. A fear and selling anomaly that extreme is going to leave all gold’s technicals hopelessly broken. A panic’s technical carnage is complete, utter devastation.

Panics are extreme herd behavior, nearly everyone succumbing to fear at once and frantically galloping for the hills. So I don’t even know if they are explainable, since the herd ignores innumerable sparks for decades on end until one inexplicably ignites a stampede for the exits. Nevertheless, we have to try and understand this gold panic and its implications. And like everything in the markets, that requires context.
The lead in to the gold panic starts way back in the summer of 2011. Fears of Washington actually defaulting on US Treasuries in the last debt-ceiling fight spawned a rare summer surge in gold. Flight capital poured into this metal so it simply shot up too far too fast, becoming very overbought. Right at the peak I warned that a sharp gold correction was imminent, as excessive popular greed is never sustainable.
Before we move on, that August 2011 bull high itself is incredibly important today. The gold bears are out in force making the case that gold’s secular bull is over. If they are right, its end had to be that August 2011 high. But as I explained last year, that looked nothing like a gold bull climax. There was no popular mania, gold was just overbought. And if that wasn’t a bull-slaying climax, gold is not in a secular bear today.
Leading into gold’s last secular-bull climax in January 1980, a whopping 3/4ths of gold’s total gains since its last major interim low a few years earlier happened in that run’s final 5 months! It was a vertical parabolic blowoff driven by a popular speculative mania. But the run up to the August 2011 high only saw 1/3rd of gold’s total gains in its major multi-year rally accrue in the final 5 months. It wasn’t a parabolic climax!
So gold wasn’t and isn’t in a new secular bear, but it did need to correct after that summer 2011 surge like all bull markets. And correct it did. It fell sharply in a massive initial correction, bounced, and then fell sharply again heading into late 2011. That weak price action would establish a major multi-year support line that was likely the primary contributing factor to the recent gold panic. $1550 would hold for years.
If gold’s bull had really died in August 2011, the gold price would have kept on relentlessly falling rather than consolidating high. That consolidation between $1550 support and $1775 resistance ultimately helped form the huge descending-triangle technical formation highlighted in yellow. An upside breakout from such a large and long-lived triangle would be a very bullish omen for any market, as it was for gold.
Gold broke out decisively to the upside late last summer. Futures speculators, who are always wrong at price extremes as a group, were hyper-bearish which is a major buy signal. So gold surged impressively last August and September even though it was loathed by mainstream analysts and investors. But that run also proved too far too fast, gold took a breather to consolidate a bit at that $1775 resistance line.
This metal soon started climbing again in early November, but then a second major contributing factor to the panic started to emerge. The general stock markets bottomed then and started to rally, despite all the intense political and taxation uncertainty. As this stock rally grew and grew, first achieving new cyclical-bull highs and then nominal record highs, demand for alternative investments like gold simply shriveled.
Gold’s weakness over the 5 months or so since is a direct result of the increasing euphoria and high complacency the levitating stock markets generated. Gold started exhibiting a high negative correlation to the flagship S&P 500 stock index, on timeframes running from intraday to monthly. Mainstream money managers were selling their small gold allocations low in order to buy stocks high, so gold suffered.
This increasingly-poor gold sentiment as capital rotated out of the metal to chase melting-up general stock markets triggered serious differential selling pressure in the leading gold ETF, GLD. Stock investors were selling GLD shares much faster than gold was being sold, spawning the biggest correction in GLD’s physical-gold-bullion holdings since the stock panic. This GLD selling further weighed on the gold price.
While this weak gold action thanks to the lofty stock markets sucking away interest and capital from alternative investments was very frustrating for contrarians like me, gold was still holding its own. Several times since February’s capitulation (which are normally selling climaxes marking major lows), gold bounced near its major $1550 support. This resilience was despite the stock market edging ever higher.
And last Thursday afternoon at $1561, gold was again just above $1550. Since $1550 had held rock-solid through a major correction and high consolidation for the better part of two years, many gold futures speculators had stop losses placed just under it. You generally allow a 1% overshoot on major support and resistance lines to make sure any breakout is real, so a big mass of stops was set around $1535 or so.
All last week, gold was under pressure because of fears the Central Bank of Cyprus would be forced to dump that country’s official gold holdings into the marketplace. If you have any experience in the gold market, you know that central-bank selling is its ultimate bugbear. With sentiment already weak thanks to the anti-alternative-investment fallout from the stock-market melt-up, these fears really took root.
This Cyprus gold-sale talk left me pulling out my hair in frustration. Why? Cyprus’s official gold holdings are trivial, just 13.9 metric tons! They rank 55th out of the world’s countries, and the gold market could have easily absorbed them in a single day. In fact, on three separate trading days since mid-February the leading GLD ETF alone had been forced to liquidate 20.8t, 13.5t, and 16.8t. Cyprus’s gold is nothing.
Another contributing factor psychologically earlier that week was major investment banks predicting gold was heading much lower. This shouldn’t have scared anyone either though, as Wall Street always makes the wrong calls at extremes. These same major banks were very bullish on gold in August 2011 as it peaked, calling for imminent surges well into the $2000s. And they were bearish on stocks in early 2009.
But with gold near $1550 support just above a minefield of stops, any selling at all could start an avalanche. And it did, even though the odds were wildly against it. Last Friday morning gold was at $1545 before the main US futures-trading session opened, and sold off sharply soon after. Once gold dropped 1% under that $1550 support, stops began to trigger. Selling begets selling, driving prices lower in a vicious circle.
And this gold selling was completely futures-based initially as the panic started cascading. Gold futures are a highly-leveraged vehicle. Though they’ve since been raised a little, that morning the maintenance margin on COMEX gold futures was just $5,400 per contract. That means futures traders could control 100 ounces of gold worth $156,100 for just 3.5% down. That is insanely-risky 29-to-1 leverage!
In the stock markets, the Federal Reserve has limited margin to 2 to 1 since 1974 (a brutal year that saw a near-panic). Yet even with 50% down, panics are still possible as we learned in 2008. Imagine the gold futures traders Friday morning taking 100% losses on a 3.5% gold swoon. If gold went down 7%, they would lose twice the capital they originally risked! Leverage is a dangerous, unforgiving game to play.
So early on Friday, the gold futures traders who wisely had stops since their leverage is so extreme got stopped out. Their automatic selling pushed gold prices lower. Then other futures traders who were paying attention sold too, before their 50% losses mushroomed to 100% or beyond. And margin calls were shooting out, futures trading houses demanding clients add more cash to cover their gold losses.
In ultra-rare extreme-selloff scenarios, the brokerages liquidate treacherous longs themselves. The markets are moving so fast that there isn’t time to track down their clients and get money wired. So they dump futures contracts en masse themselves, traders aren’t even given a chance to make a sell decision. These margin calls and forced liquidations are, without any doubt, what fueled that crazy gold panic.
Of course with gold plunging, stock traders soon joined the futures traders in fleeing in terror. They started selling GLD shares aggressively as Friday wore on, ultimately forcing this ETF’s custodians to liquidate another 22.9t of its holdings (1.9%). But as I discussed last week in an essay written Thursday (before the panic), clusters of 1.0%+ down days in GLD holdings near gold lows are major bottoming indicators.
Friday gold plunged 4.7% by the time the US stock markets closed, a very large loss. But it still wasn’t panic-grade yet. During this secular gold bull which was born in April 2001, gold had fallen by more than 4.5% on 9 previous trading days (out of 3029). And I remember every single one of them, they were miserable if we happened to be long then. Friday is the worst psychological time for an outsized selloff.
Near extreme lows sentiment is overwhelmingly bearish, with everyone falling all over themselves to rationalize why the already-battered price is doomed to head much lower still. The weekends also prevent traders, both American and foreign, from acting on their growing fears as they read all this weathervaney hyper-bearish commentary. They stew and fret all weekend, and return Monday ready to literally panic.
We’ve seen the dangers Mondays present many times in the stock markets. Remember Black Monday 1987? That dark day in October the S&P 500 plummeted 25.7% after a 5.4% loss the preceding Friday! In August 2011, that same index plunged 6.7% on another Monday after Standard & Poor’s downgraded US Treasuries for the first time in history after the preceding Friday’s close. Mondays are dangerous times when weekend fear is extreme.
So the forced gold selling continued Monday morning, first in Asia and Europe. Those markets were mostly closed on Friday when gold started plunging in the States, so foreign futures traders were suffering the same margin calls and forced liquidations the very next trading day. They continued in the US too, with gold plummeting an unbelievable 9.6%! That has only happened 2 other times since 1969, virtually never.
And it was mostly futures selling Monday, leveraged players getting eviscerated for their own greed and stupidity. Even though gold’s down day was the largest since February 1983, 30 years ago, GLD only experienced enough differential selling pressure to force its holdings 0.4% lower (4.2t). The stock-trader selling was mostly out of the way Friday, when fully 5/6ths of it occurred as measured by GLD bullion liquidations.
The gold panic was a forced-selling phenomenon driven by a support break crushing over-leveraged futures players. Unfortunately their mistakes caused vast collateral damage among the rest of us. I’ve never seen my portfolio lose a sixth of its value over two trading days before, even during 2008′s once-in-a-century stock panic. This gold panic is one of my worst experiences in decades of trading. It royally sucked.
But like anything in the markets, there is no sense getting emotional about it. What has come can’t be changed, all that matters is the future. And it is critical to realize that all panics are emotional events, they have nothing to do with fundamentals. It is quite literally impossible for global supply and demand fundamentals in gold or anything to change fast enough to justify a 1/7th plunge in two trading days.
The bullish fundamentals for gold did not change one bit between Thursday afternoon and Monday afternoon, despite gold being 13.8% lower. The only thing that changed is sentiment. Traders got scared, the selling breached a major stops zone, which resulted in margin calls and forced liquidations, and the gold price is much lower as a result. But nothing fundamental changed in the gold market!
The central banks didn’t suddenly dump their vast gold hoards, no one figured out how to economically precipitate gold out of seawater or use alchemy to transmute it in a laboratory, and no massive new gold mines suddenly came online. Whatever gold fundamentals existed last week are exactly the same now. Gold is a global and slow-moving industry, with supply and demand trends gradually evolving over many years.
If fundamentals haven’t changed, then there is no reason for gold and gold-stock investors to join the hysteria and sell near major multi-year lows. Investing is about being brave when others are afraid, and in gold and especially gold stocks they are terrified right now. And thanks to the precedent of 2008′s stock panic, which hammered gold, we know that the gold extremes just reached are actually very bullish.

This longer-term chart helps put gold’s panic in better strategic context. Yes the panic shattered gold’s multi-year high consolidation and pushed its total correction to 29.0% over 19.8 months. But interestingly we have seen worse within this secular bull! In just 7.9 months in 2008, gold plunged 29.3%. That stock panic drove the metal down over twice as fast in aggregate, although its climax wasn’t quite as extreme.
Back in that stock panic, gold investors were also terrified. They believed the mainstream hype that gold was dead. After all, if gold couldn’t act as a safe haven during a once-in-a-lifetime stock panic, why would anyone want to own it? They proclaimed the US dollar and US Treasuries were the new safe havens, that gold’s secular bull had failed miserably. The universal gold hate in late 2008 dwarfed today’s.
But all debating aside, gold had fallen too far too fast for its late-2008 prices to be sustainable. It was hyper-oversold, as measured by my highly-profitable Relative Gold trading indicator. In both October and November 2008, gold sunk down to 0.807x its own 200-day moving average. This was unprecedented within its secular bull, so all hope seemed lost. The technically-broken metal was down near $700.
But the bears were wrong, and the gold bulls like me were right and made fortunes buying in that stock panic. Gold would more than double after those extreme oversold stock-panic lows, powering 166.5% higher over the subsequent several years or so. When a price is at extreme lows, has fallen exceedingly far and fast, but its underlying supply and demand fundamentals remain bullish, it is the ideal time to buy.
This Monday, gold revisited those panic levels relative to its 200dma! It traded at 0.810x in rGold terms, almost exactly the same degree of oversoldness it bottomed at during 2008′s stock panic. And after panics, even in the stock markets, prices always at least double over the subsequent two or three years regardless of whether a secular bull or bear is in force. Gold’s panic likely guarantees a coming doubling!
As long as global gold demand growth continues to outpace supply growth, gold’s secular bull remains alive and well. So a post-panic doubling to $2700 is merely par for the course. New gold mines take a decade to bring online, and the lack of investor enthusiasm for gold stocks during gold’s high consolidation has decimated this industry anyway. There will be no big supply increases for years to come.
Meanwhile global investment demand is almost certain to recover and grow dramatically. Global central banks are drastically ramping their money supplies, leading to very overbought and toppy stock markets. Once these inevitably turn, demand for alternative investments will recover then soar. And investors are woefully underinvested in gold, it is still on the order of only 0.5% of Americans’ total portfolios.
This gold panic is the ultimate test of our contrarian mettle as gold investors. Are we rational and tough enough to weather it, or will we panic and sell low? At Zeal our decades of study and trading have forged us into traders who simply don’t feel fear. We are well aware of the risks, but like elite commandos going into combat our extensive training has eliminated fear. Fear is for the naive, not the battle-hardened.
The gold panic hammered gold down to panic-level oversoldness, but gold stocks actually to literal panic levels. The bargains among dirt-cheap hyper-oversold gold stocks are truly epic, the greatest of this entire secular bull by far after the stock panic. So if you want to buy low, check out our extensive research on our fundamental favorite gold and silver stocks. We sell popular and inexpensive reports detailing our extensive research into the world’s best precious-metals miners and explorers. Buy yours today!
We’ve also long published acclaimed weekly and monthly subscription newsletters for speculators and investors. Our hardcore contrarian approach will give you invaluable knowledge and perspective that will help you learn how to buy low and sell high. It works, with the 637 stock trades recommended in our newsletters since 2001 averaging stellar annualized realized gains of +33.9%! Fear and greed can be overcome, we can help you do it. Subscribe today!
The bottom line is gold just experienced a totally anomalous panic. Gold’s sentiment has been getting increasingly bearish as the levitating stock markets sucked all capital out of everything else. This slowly pushed gold down to major multi-year support. And then some selling on minor news triggered stops and fed on itself. This resulted in margin calls and forced liquidations among leveraged futures traders.
So gold plunged. But as always in panics, such extreme selling is unsustainable. It burns itself out very quickly, leaving nothing but bargain-hunting buyers. So prices recover rapidly after panics, and ultimately more than double over the subsequent few years on the outside. The traders tough enough to buy low, or hold low, when everyone else is terrified earn fortunes in these massive post-panic rallies.
###
Apr 19, 2013
http://www.321gold.com/editorials/hamil … 41913.html
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:15 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Gold and Silver • Gold Panic? SPROTT’S THOUGHTS
Gold Panic? SPROTT’S THOUGHTS
MONDAY, APRIL 15, 2013
David Franklin
Gold Panic?
http://www.sprottgroup.com/thoughts/art … old-panic/
The recent price action in gold can only be described as ‘panic selling’. Money managers and veteran traders know that when panic sets in and markets start moving rapidly, "investing" logic drops by the wayside and money begins to flow one direction only. We have seen this over the last two trading days in long gold positions in the futures and ETF markets. This selling in turn drives prices lower, forcing those holders on margin to liquidate their positions. This process leads to even more selling as the pain of holding levered "under water" positions becomes too great, causing traders to liquidate their positions. The light at the end of the tunnel for precious metals investors is that these events have been value-buying opportunities that occur only a few times a decade.
In the recent selloff, the gold market has been hit from all sides by news and events that have caused significant liquidation in the Comex and gold ETF markets. The first event was a report from Goldman Sachs downgrading its outlook for the gold price, sighting the precious metal’s lacklustre price performance through the Cyprus crisis and a fresh batch of disappointing economic data points from the US. Last week, Goldman Sachs stated their belief that we have seen the top in gold and predicted that its value will decline to $US1200 an ounce over the next few years. Then on Friday, Mario Draghi suggested that the sale of 400 million euros worth of Cypriot gold reserves would be used to cover any losses the European Central Bank may sustain from emergency loans to Cyprus’s commercial banks. Further adding selling pressure to gold, the minutes from the last FOMC meeting, suggested there was dissention in the ranks of Fed governors concerning the future of quantitative easing in the US. George Soros, changed his opinion on gold stating that "gold was destroyed as a safe haven". The Goldman Sachs report putting a $1200 target for gold, combined with forced selling of gold by Cyprus and questions about how long the Fed would continue monetary easing was too much for gold traders to take. Reports suggest that on Friday morning, a 124.4 tonne sell-order by a large investment bank spooked the markets and led to this decline. Intense liquidation of gold ETF’s, a favourite investment theme two years ago, suddenly seemed like a trade that has ‘played out’. As a result, panic set in and the gold market moved quickly to capitulation.
The gold market has seen this before. Think back to 2008. At that time we were told that there was no reason to own gold anymore, is was no longer a safe haven and that its bull run was over. Sound familiar? The main reason gold plummeted during that panic was because safe-haven buying flooded into US dollars instead of gold, driving the biggest rally the greenback has ever witnessed. Gold subsequently bounced back from this selloff and went on to new highs. What did we learn in 2008? We learned that it was a mistake to sell gold when it was out of favour and at a low. In our opinion, the accelerated decline we have seen in the first quarter of 2013, suggests we are in a similar capitulation phase, as investors temporarily abandon their gold exposure.
For all the short term pain it has caused, we view this selloff as an opportunity. All the pre-conditions that brought gold to this point are still intact. The bond market is still showing negative interest rates, Japan and the United States plan to flood the world with a liquidity injection of almost $2 trillion dollars over the next 12 months, and not one G20 country has a balanced budget. While market commentators are predicting gold’s demise as an asset class, astute investors will recognize that we have seen these conditions before over the last 12 years. Each time the ‘paper market’ for gold has capitulated it has represented a buying opportunity for gold rarely seen again. Despite this panic selling on Comex and other ‘paper’ markets, investors in the physical market for gold, have been taking advantage of this price action. Anecdotal data from precious metals dealers suggests that buying interest has been strong, with delays being reported for delivery of coins and bars. The macroeconomic case for gold is as strong as it has ever been and now investor sentiment has reached a negative extreme. Patience will be rewarded; we’ve seen this all before.
Statistics: Posted by DIGGER DAN — Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:03 am
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
International News • Mass Panic In Cyprus: The Banks Are Collapsing And ATMs Are
Mass Panic In Cyprus: The Banks Are Collapsing And ATMs Are Running Out Of Money
By Michael, on March 21st, 2013
European officials are openly admitting that the two largest banks in Cyprus are "insolvent", and it is now being reported that Cyprus Popular Bank only has "enough liquidity to cover the next few hours". Of course all banks in Cyprus are officially closed until Tuesday at the earliest, but there have been long lines at ATMs all over Cyprus as people scramble to get whatever money they can out of the banks. Unfortunately, some ATMs appear to be "malfunctioning" and others appear to have already run out of cash. You can see some photos of huge lines at one ATM in Cyprus right here. Some businesses are now even refusing to take credit card payments. This is creating an atmosphere of panic on the streets of Cyprus. Meanwhile, the EU is holding a gun to the head of the Cyprus financial system. Either Cyprus meets EU demands by Monday, or liquidity for the banks will be totally cut off and Cyprus will be forced out of the euro. It is being reported that European officials believe that the "economy is going to tank in Cyprus no matter what", and that it would be okay to let the financial system of Cyprus crash and burn if politicians in Cyprus are not willing to do what they have been ordered to do. Apparently European officials are very confident that the situation in Cyprus can be contained and that it will not spread to other European nations.
Unfortunately, European officials are losing sight of the bigger picture. If the largest banks in Cyprus are allowed to fail, it will be another "Lehman Brothers moment". The faith that people have in banks all over Europe will be called into question, and everyone will be wondering what major European banks will be allowed to fail next.
Meanwhile, European officials have already completely shattered confidence in deposit insurance at this point. Everyone now knows that when there is a major bank failure that depositors will be expected to share in the pain. Expect to see "bank jogs" all over southern Europe over the coming weeks.
The banks in Cyprus had been scheduled to reopen on Tuesday, but very few people expect that to actually happen at this point. In fact, Bloomberg is reporting that EU officials are actually thinking about shutting down the two biggest banks in Cyprus and freezing their assets…
Finance ministers for the 17 euro countries are considering a plan to shutter the two biggest banks in Cyprus and freeze the assets of uninsured depositors, said the four officials, who asked not to be named because the talks are ongoing. The ministers are holding a teleconference tonight.
Cyprus Popular Bank Pcl (CPB) and the Bank of Cyprus Plc would be split to create a so-called bad bank, one of the officials said. Insured deposits — below the European Union ceiling of 100,000 euros ($129,000) — would go into a so-called good bank and not sustain any losses, while uninsured deposits would go into the bad bank and be frozen until assets could be sold, said the four officials.
Losses to unsecured creditors, including uninsured depositors, could reach 40 percent under the plan, which has support from the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank. The proposal, a version of which was rejected last week, is considered a better option than taxing insured deposits or allowing Cypriot banks to collapse in a disorderly fashion if they lose access to ECB aid, the officials said.
Such a scenario would be an utter disaster.
How would you feel if you woke up someday and 40 percent of your life savings was suddenly gone?
According to Greek newspaper Kathimerini, European officials are also openly discussing the possibility of a Cyprus exit from the eurozone if a suitable bailout agreement is not worked out…
The possibility of Cyprus exiting the eurozone was discussed during teleconference involving technocrats from the Euro Working Group on Wednesday, Kathimerini understands.
A reliable source told Kathimerini that the technical implications of a euro exit, as well as the adoption of capital controls were debated by the Euro Working Group officials during the teleconference.
As I mentioned above, European officials seemed resigned to the fact that there will be an economic collapse in Cyprus "no matter what", and so letting Cyprus leave the euro would not make that much of a difference. Either way, the banks are going to have to be "reorganized" and capital controls will be imposed…
In detailed notes of the call seen by Reuters, the group’s chair Austria’s Thomas Wieser said: “The economy is going to tank in Cyprus no matter what. Restrictions on capital will probably be imposed.”
Never before have we seen European officials impose such a harsh ultimatum with such a short deadline. It is almost as if they want to boot Cyprus out of the euro. The following comes from a recent CNBC report…
In stark twin warnings on Thursday, the European Central Bank said it would cut off liquidity to Cypriot banks and a senior EU official made clear to Reuters that the bloc was ready to see the bankrupt island banished from the euro in the belief it could then contain damage to the wider European economy.
And European officials are even publicly talking about the possibility that Cyprus will soon need to start using "their own currency"…
In Brussels, a senior European Union official told Reuters that an ECB withdrawal would mean Cyprus’s biggest banks being wound up, wiping out the large deposits it has sought to protect, and probably forcing the country to abandon the euro.
"If the financial sector collapses, then they simply have to face a very significant devaluation and faced with that situation, they would have no other way but to start having their own currency," the EU official said.
This is absolutely shocking. Everyone always thought that Greece would be the first to leave the euro, but now it looks like it might be Cyprus.
However, there is still a chance that Cyprus may find a way to comply with EU demands. Politicians in Cyprus are frantically searching for a way to raise the needed cash without raiding private bank accounts. The following is what CNN is saying about the latest efforts…
Leaders of Cyprus’ political parties agreed Thursday to create an "investment solidarity fund," which would issue bonds backed by state and church assets.
The plan was due to be discussed by the Cypriot government and parliament on Thursday evening, but few details were available and it was not clear how much the fund would be worth.
According to Reuters, other proposals have been under consideration as well…
The government said a "Plan B" was in the works.
Officials said it could include: an option to nationalize pension funds of semi-government corporations, which hold between 2 billion and 3 billion euros; issuing an emergency bond linked to future natural gas revenues; and possibly reviving the levy on bank deposits, though at a lower level than originally planned and maybe excluding savers with less than 100,000 euros.
At this point it is unclear whether any of those proposals will turn out to be acceptable to European officials.
In fact, the tone of European officials has noticeably changed from previous bailout efforts. They now seem much more willing to play hardball. For example, just check out what German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble is saying about the situation in Cyprus…
German finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble told the ZDF public broadcaster on Tuesday night (19 March) he "took note with regret" of the Cypriot parliament’s rejection of the bailout deal, but insisted that the terms will stay the same.
Asked if the eurozone was willing to let Cyprus go bust, he answered: "Well, we are much more stable in the eurozone – we took measures to protect ourselves from the risks of contagion … but I don’t want to have any of this."
He added: "It is a serious situation, but this cannot lead to a decision that makes absolutely no sense, to rescue a business model that has failed. Cyprus has a banking sector that is totally oversized and this made Cyprus insolvent. And nobody outside Cyprus is to blame for it."
Schaeuble knows that the EU is holding all of the cards and that Cyprus is doomed without their help…
"The Cypriot state cannot fund itself on the markets. Its two largest banks are insolvent and are being kept afloat with emergency funding from the ECB, but only on the condition that there will be a long-term rescue programme. If this condition is no longer met, Cyprus will no longer be solvent and this is something Cypriot decision makers must know"
But the truth is that the EU can’t really afford to allow major banks to fail or for a single member to leave the eurozone. If either of those things happen, the confidence game that has been holding the European financial system together will begin to rapidly evaporate.
If the EU thinks that they can abandon Cyprus without the crisis spreading to the rest of southern Europe they are just being delusional.
At least there are a few politicians in Europe that understand what is happening. Nigel Farage, a very outspoken member of the European Parliament, is telling people to get their money out of banks in southern Europe as quickly as they can. He is warning that a great collapse of the European financial system is coming and that people need to get prepared for it…
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/arch … t-of-money
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:47 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Mass Panic In Cyprus: The Banks Are Collapsing And ATMs Are Running Out Of Money
European officials are openly admitting that the two largest banks in Cyprus are “insolvent“, and it is now being reported that Cyprus Popular Bank only has “enough liquidity to cover the next few hours“. Of course all banks in Cyprus are officially closed until Tuesday at the earliest, but there have been long lines at ATMs all over Cyprus as people scramble to get whatever money they can out of the banks. Unfortunately, some ATMs appear to be “malfunctioning” and others appear to have already run out of cash. You can see some photos of huge lines at one ATM in Cyprus right here. Some businesses are now even refusing to take credit card payments. This is creating an atmosphere of panic on the streets of Cyprus. Meanwhile, the EU is holding a gun to the head of the Cyprus financial system. Either Cyprus meets EU demands by Monday, or liquidity for the banks will be totally cut off and Cyprus will be forced out of the euro. It is being reported that European officials believe that the “economy is going to tank in Cyprus no matter what“, and that it would be okay to let the financial system of Cyprus crash and burn if politicians in Cyprus are not willing to do what they have been ordered to do. Apparently European officials are very confident that the situation in Cyprus can be contained and that it will not spread to other European nations.
Unfortunately, European officials are losing sight of the bigger picture. If the largest banks in Cyprus are allowed to fail, it will be another “Lehman Brothers moment“. The faith that people have in banks all over Europe will be called into question, and everyone will be wondering what major European banks will be allowed to fail next.
Meanwhile, European officials have already completely shattered confidence in deposit insurance at this point. Everyone now knows that when there is a major bank failure that depositors will be expected to share in the pain. Expect to see “bank jogs” all over southern Europe over the coming weeks.
The banks in Cyprus had been scheduled to reopen on Tuesday, but very few people expect that to actually happen at this point. In fact, Bloomberg is reporting that EU officials are actually thinking about shutting down the two biggest banks in Cyprus and freezing their assets…
Finance ministers for the 17 euro countries are considering a plan to shutter the two biggest banks in Cyprus and freeze the assets of uninsured depositors, said the four officials, who asked not to be named because the talks are ongoing. The ministers are holding a teleconference tonight.
Cyprus Popular Bank Pcl (CPB) and the Bank of Cyprus Plc would be split to create a so-called bad bank, one of the officials said. Insured deposits — below the European Union ceiling of 100,000 euros ($129,000) — would go into a so-called good bank and not sustain any losses, while uninsured deposits would go into the bad bank and be frozen until assets could be sold, said the four officials.
Losses to unsecured creditors, including uninsured depositors, could reach 40 percent under the plan, which has support from the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank. The proposal, a version of which was rejected last week, is considered a better option than taxing insured deposits or allowing Cypriot banks to collapse in a disorderly fashion if they lose access to ECB aid, the officials said.
Such a scenario would be an utter disaster.
How would you feel if you woke up someday and 40 percent of your life savings was suddenly gone?
According to Greek newspaper Kathimerini, European officials are also openly discussing the possibility of a Cyprus exit from the eurozone if a suitable bailout agreement is not worked out…
The possibility of Cyprus exiting the eurozone was discussed during teleconference involving technocrats from the Euro Working Group on Wednesday, Kathimerini understands.
A reliable source told Kathimerini that the technical implications of a euro exit, as well as the adoption of capital controls were debated by the Euro Working Group officials during the teleconference.
As I mentioned above, European officials seemed resigned to the fact that there will be an economic collapse in Cyprus “no matter what”, and so letting Cyprus leave the euro would not make that much of a difference. Either way, the banks are going to have to be “reorganized” and capital controls will be imposed…
In detailed notes of the call seen by Reuters, the group’s chair Austria’s Thomas Wieser said: “The economy is going to tank in Cyprus no matter what. Restrictions on capital will probably be imposed.”
Never before have we seen European officials impose such a harsh ultimatum with such a short deadline. It is almost as if they want to boot Cyprus out of the euro. The following comes from a recent CNBC report…
In stark twin warnings on Thursday, the European Central Bank said it would cut off liquidity to Cypriot banks and a senior EU official made clear to Reuters that the bloc was ready to see the bankrupt island banished from the euro in the belief it could then contain damage to the wider European economy.
And European officials are even publicly talking about the possibility that Cyprus will soon need to start using “their own currency”…
In Brussels, a senior European Union official told Reuters that an ECB withdrawal would mean Cyprus’s biggest banks being wound up, wiping out the large deposits it has sought to protect, and probably forcing the country to abandon the euro.
“If the financial sector collapses, then they simply have to face a very significant devaluation and faced with that situation, they would have no other way but to start having their own currency,” the EU official said.
This is absolutely shocking. Everyone always thought that Greece would be the first to leave the euro, but now it looks like it might be Cyprus.
However, there is still a chance that Cyprus may find a way to comply with EU demands. Politicians in Cyprus are frantically searching for a way to raise the needed cash without raiding private bank accounts. The following is what CNN is saying about the latest efforts…
Leaders of Cyprus’ political parties agreed Thursday to create an “investment solidarity fund,” which would issue bonds backed by state and church assets.
The plan was due to be discussed by the Cypriot government and parliament on Thursday evening, but few details were available and it was not clear how much the fund would be worth.
According to Reuters, other proposals have been under consideration as well…
The government said a “Plan B” was in the works.
Officials said it could include: an option to nationalize pension funds of semi-government corporations, which hold between 2 billion and 3 billion euros; issuing an emergency bond linked to future natural gas revenues; and possibly reviving the levy on bank deposits, though at a lower level than originally planned and maybe excluding savers with less than 100,000 euros.
At this point it is unclear whether any of those proposals will turn out to be acceptable to European officials.
In fact, the tone of European officials has noticeably changed from previous bailout efforts. They now seem much more willing to play hardball. For example, just check out what German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble is saying about the situation in Cyprus…
German finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble told the ZDF public broadcaster on Tuesday night (19 March) he “took note with regret” of the Cypriot parliament’s rejection of the bailout deal, but insisted that the terms will stay the same.
Asked if the eurozone was willing to let Cyprus go bust, he answered: “Well, we are much more stable in the eurozone – we took measures to protect ourselves from the risks of contagion … but I don’t want to have any of this.”
He added: “It is a serious situation, but this cannot lead to a decision that makes absolutely no sense, to rescue a business model that has failed. Cyprus has a banking sector that is totally oversized and this made Cyprus insolvent. And nobody outside Cyprus is to blame for it.”
Schaeuble knows that the EU is holding all of the cards and that Cyprus is doomed without their help…
“The Cypriot state cannot fund itself on the markets. Its two largest banks are insolvent and are being kept afloat with emergency funding from the ECB, but only on the condition that there will be a long-term rescue programme. If this condition is no longer met, Cyprus will no longer be solvent and this is something Cypriot decision makers must know”
But the truth is that the EU can’t really afford to allow major banks to fail or for a single member to leave the eurozone. If either of those things happen, the confidence game that has been holding the European financial system together will begin to rapidly evaporate.
If the EU thinks that they can abandon Cyprus without the crisis spreading to the rest of southern Europe they are just being delusional.
At least there are a few politicians in Europe that understand what is happening. Nigel Farage, a very outspoken member of the European Parliament, is telling people to get their money out of banks in southern Europe as quickly as they can. He is warning that a great collapse of the European financial system is coming and that people need to get prepared for it…
So what do you think?
Do you believe that we are on the verge of a major financial collapse in Europe?
Please feel free to post a comment with your thoughts below…
View full post on The Economic Collapse
International News • Insane EU: Bank depositors in panic as they pay for Cyprus
Insane EU: Bank depositors in panic as they pay for Cyprus €10bn bailout
Saturday, March 16, 2013 3:48
(Before It’s News)
Bank depositors will have to finance 60% of the 10-billion-euro bailout for Cyprus agreed between European Union and International Monetary Fund in Brussels in the early morning hours of Saturday. Eurozone ministers force depositors at Cypriot banks to pay a one time levy to raise 6 billion euros. The so-called “emergency solidarity contribution” will force savers to see their bank deposits undergo a 6.7%-9% “haircut”, while bondholders will not suffer any losses at all.
Savers with more than 100,000 euro in bank deposits will pay a 9.9% levy.
Savers with less than 100,000 euro will pay 6.7% contribution to the bailout.
There is no minimum deposit capital cap.
The decision will not affect bank deposits in Cypriot banks abroad (state RIK TV).
Tax on bank deposits interest is expected to be 20-25%.
The bailout is needed to recapitalise Cypriot banks, without it Cyprus would most likely default.
“Cyprus state broadcaster CyBC reported on Saturday that German Finance Minister actually entered the Eurogroup meeting on Friday proposing a 40 percent haircut on Cypriot bank accounts. Finance Minister Michalis Sarris stated on Saturday that this had also been the proposal of the International Monetary Fund.”(ekathimerini)
Changes will have to be ratified by the House of Representatives, the Cypriot parliament within the weekend, while an emergency cabinet meeting is taking place on Saturday morning in Nicosia to assess the
situation.
Cyprus president Nicos Anastasiadis, assumed office 28. February 2013
Risks of bank run
The decision bears the high risk of a bank run with depositors most likely to rush and withdraw their money to avoid the levy. The decision will come into force on Tuesday, after a bank holiday on Monday.
According to media reports, Cyprus blocked the electronic money transfers as soon as the decision was taken.
Hit by this decision are not only Cypriots but also Greeks who had transferred their money to Cypriot banks during the crisis, Russians and Brits.
Panic and Anger
Dozens of people formed long queues outside credit societies on Saturday morning as Cypriots rushed to withdraw their money. The General Director of co-op credit societies told media that “the system was frozen” and announced the closure these money institutes over the weekend.
Co-op credit societies, normally open on Saturdays, were shut for business in the coastal town of Larnaca as depositors started queuing early in the morning to withdraw their cash.
“I’m extremely angry. I worked years and years to get it together and now I am losing it on the say-so of the Dutch and the Germans,” said British-Cypriot Andy Georgiou, 54, who returned to Cyprus in mid-2012 with his savings.
“They call Sicily the island of the mafia. It’s not Sicily, it’s Cyprus. This is theft, pure and simple,” said a pensioner. (full story & Brussels background Reuters)
As the panicked bank depositors tried to find alternative solutions and rushed to ATMs, those were soon “out of order” as they dried out of cash.
Unconfirmed information claim that the bank withdrawal system was holding back a percentage for the levy.
Speaking to state TV RIK, Cypriots complained that they were caught “asleep” as rumors and leakages to the press before the bailout agreement were claiming that bank deposits below 100,000 would be not touched.
Cyprus becomes the fourth country after Greece, Ireland and Portugal to turn to the euro zone for financial help in the wake of the region’s debt crisis.
This is a radical, unprecedented and immoral departure from all previous aid packages mechanisms, where citizens will have to pay twice for their own bailout. And almost equally: the one with 100,000 euro deposits and the one with 10,000 or even 100 euro.
By blocking all the money transfer and withdrawal systems, the EU finance ministers topple any democratic procedures of the same European Union by prohibiting “free move of goods and money”.
But who cares? Tthe banks can be saved….
http://beforeitsnews.com/international/ … 53846.html
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:56 am
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
American • Panic in Detroit
Written by Jeff Nielson
Thursday, 14 March 2013 14:16
My apologies to David Bowie for ‘borrowing’ the title of one of his songs for this article. However, there is no better way to encapsulate the financial emergency currently facing this bankrupt shell.
What is a “panic”? It’s when people behave irrationally in a crisis, generally due to either being in a state of shock, succumbing to some form of (mindless) “herd behavior”, or both. In the case of Detroit we are clearly dealing with the latter condition.
What makes Detroit such a significant case-study here is not simply its size, but rather because it is well-known that the city is (was) a one-industry town. Specifically, “Motor City” got its nickname for being the hub of the once-thriving U.S. auto industry.
More importantly, as the city teeters on the brink of formal bankruptcy, we know what got the city to this state of ultimate crisis: the loss of its tax-base. We can establish this point not only on an individual basis, but also on a collective basis.
Individually, we have what has already been pointed out: the collapse of one industry in a one-industry town (state). More generally however, when the financial collapse of Detroit is examined more closely we see the same phrase crop-up that we see in the chronologies of every U.S. city/state/municipality with serious financial problems: “overly optimistic revenue estimates.”
The same governments, and the same people working in those governments who used to be able to make accurate revenue projections have not only seemingly and suddenly lost the capacity to perform this function; but they all suffer from precisely the same (wildly) optimistic bias.
What is the more rational conclusion for us to draw in assessing this situation? Is it more plausible that once-sober bureaucrats from all across the U.S. all suddenly and simultaneously morphed into cock-eyed optimists? Or is it more likely that the data they have been given on which to base their calculations has become severely flawed? Garbage in; garbage out.
Specifically, the macroeconomic “statistics” being passed-off on Americans (and the world) by the U.S. government have been demonstrated to be nothing but absurd fantasy-numbers. The mythical “job-creation” numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics can be proven to be fraudulent on many bases; however the most absolute proof was supplied by the Corporate Media itself: job and wage numbers supplied by the BLS grossly overstate what the U.S. government is actually taking in with tax-receipts. The jobs don’t exist.
Similarly, we have the U.S. government wildly understating inflation. The epitome of this occurred in July of last year. Asian governments were having an emergency summit to deal with the “global food-price crisis”; the World Bank was reporting food-inflation at an annualized rate of 120%; and the U.S. government claimed (in this global economy) that inflation inside the U.S. was literally 0%.
As I’ve noted in previous commentaries, when any government grossly understates inflation, this automatically grossly exaggerates many statistics which are directly derived from that inflation number, most notably GDP. The “GDP growth” reported by the U.S. government for the past four years of this so-called “recovery” is no more substantial than the fantasy-jobs reported by the BLS, and no more plausible than the U.S. government’s “0% inflation” claim.
What this means is that the “state administrator” being sent in to supposedly repair Detroit’s financial crisis has a 0% chance of succeeding. Garbage in; garbage out. Armed with the same fantasy-data as his/her predecessor, the revenue projections for “the New Boss” will be just as laughably optimistic as those of “the Old Boss.”
What could (will) this administrator do?
…an appointed city manager would ultimately hold powers to cut city spending, change contracts with labor unions, merge or eliminate city departments, urge the sale of city assets, and even, if all else failed, recommend bankruptcy proceedings. [Emphasis mine]
Does this agenda sound familiar? It should. In Europe they call it Austerity. It has an unblemished track-record: complete and utter failure with every government which has inflicted this economic sadism on its own population. Just ask the people of Greece, and Spain, and Portugal, and the UK.
It’s a recipe for turning dying economies into dead economies. However, along the way; these regimes always manage to sell-off “the family jewels.” The only profitable assets of these governments are sold-off (at pennies on the dollar), and almost inevitably these assets end up in the hands of Fat Cats with close connections to whatever (corrupt) regime is administering this “austerity”.
Then once these “administrators” have finished slashing jobs, slashed compensation in negotiated contracts, merged/eliminated entire departments, and sold-off the family jewels, then they simply shrug their shoulders, declare bankruptcy anyways, and claim that “they did their best.”
Yes, I’m sure they did. But for whom did they “do their best”? Let’s take a look at what already happened in another large city, struggling with its own severe financial problems: Chicago.
What did Chicago do when it desperately needed to raise $1 billion? It sold-off its prime asset, the City’s extremely lucrative parking business. Pardon me; officially it was merely “leased” – for the next 75 years. Who snapped-up Chicago’s family-jewel? Wall Street bankster, Morgan Stanley.
Here’s where the number-crunching starts getting interesting. We have the City of Chicago, which is so hard-up for money just to “keep the lights on” that it conducted a fire-sale to sell-off its prized asset. Meanwhile, the buyer of this prized asset can (literally) get trillions of dollars in free money (so-called “0% loans”), merely by picking up the phone and calling its good friend at the Federal Reserve, B.S. Bernanke.
Cash-strapped governments all across the U.S. are forced to sell-off their best assets (at pennies on the dollar); while the same financial crime syndicate which caused the economic problems which resulted in this financial crisis is given $trillions upon $trillions in free money – and what it doesn’t use gambling in its derivatives casino goes into vulture purchases…from its Victims.
Now a financial Thug is being sent into the City of Detroit from the state capital (against the wishes of its elected government) to “do a Greece” (or “a Chicago”?) to the people of Detroit. And when the Thug is finished; the City will have been stripped of any/all profitable assets, services will be reduced to some Third World level, city employees will have their pensions stolen and their wages slashed, and then the city will be allowed to declare bankruptcy.
This organized, economic rape has been the mode for relentlessly pillaging Europe for nearly four years now, starting with Greece. Now, finally, it’s “coming to America.”
What is the “solution” for the financial problems of Detroit, Chicago, Greece, and governments across the Western world? There isn’t one. The financial crime syndicate which has been allowed to “advise” our governments on their fiscal management has led all of these governments past the point of insolvency – deliberately – just as bankers have been doing for more than 2,000 years.
Once they have bankrupted these public authorities, then (naturally) the fire-sales begin – and the bankers instantly become ravenous Vultures. Only then, inevitably “Debt Jubilee” (i.e. mass-bankruptcy and debt-amnesty) is declared. Only after there is nothing left for the banksters to steal.
It’s time to end a System where “the People” (and their governments) live in perpetual penury, while a criminal banking syndicate has vaults which are perpetually over-flowing with free money. Debt Jubilee today; exterminate the financial crime syndicate tomorrow.
The real beauty of Debt Jubilee is that once our Ponzi bond-markets have been purged of all their fraudulent debts, this “too big to fail” crime syndicate will no longer be “too big to fail.”
http://bullionbullscanada.com/us-commen … in-detroit
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:50 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
The NRA’s Panic Attack
Gene Healy
A few days ago, I made the mordant observation that the wake of the Newtown elementary school massacre would usher in “a brief period in which conservatives rue legislative panics in pursuit of perfect safety,” but come the next terrorist attack, everyone would switch sides.
Apparently, I spoke too soon. In an extraordinary statement to the press Friday, Wayne LaPierre, the head of the National Rifle Association, breathlessly demanded that we ACT NOW: “Before Congress reconvenes, before we engage in any lengthy debate over legislation, regulation or anything else, as soon as our kids return to school after the holiday break, we need to have every single school in America immediately deploy a protection program proven to work — and by that I mean armed security.” (Transcript here .pdf).
If the phrase “our kids” sticks in your craw, if you tend to think the claim that a policy is “for the children” signals a lousy argument and that promiscuous italicization overeggs the pudding, LaPierre’s speech won’t give you much cause to reconsider.
LaPierre begins by reeling off a list of the various places in American life where you can find armed guards: “American airports, office buildings, power plants, courthouses — even sports stadiums—are all protected by armed security,” LaPierre marveled; Congress has the Capitol Police, the President his Secret Service:
Yet when it comes to the most beloved, innocent and vulnerable members of the American family—our children—we as a society leave them utterly defenseless, and the monsters and predators of this world know it and exploit it. That must change now!
The truth is that our society is populated by an unknown number of genuine monsters—people so deranged, so evil, so possessed by voices and driven by demons that no sane person can possibly ever comprehend them. They walk among us every day. And does anybody really believe that the next Adam Lanza isn’t planning his attack on a school he’s already identified at this very moment?
How many more copycats are waiting in the wings?…. A dozen more killers? A hundred? More?
Er, probably not, Wayne. “Multiple-victim homicides at schools, however, occur very rarely. Of the last 109 incidents of school-associated student homicides studied, 101 involved one victim only.” That’s from a 2010 Education Researcher report, “What Can Be Done About School Shootings? A Review of the Evidence.” (.pdf). In it, the authors put the problem in perspective with a rough, back-of-the-envelope calculation:
In the 10-year period from 1996–1997 to 2005–2006, 207 student homicides occurred in U.S. schools, an average of 21 deaths per year. Dividing the nation’s approximately 125,000 elementary and secondary schools (U.S. Department of Education, 2008) by 21, any given school can expect to experience a student homicide about once every 6,000 years.
Yet LaPierre insists the monsters are all around us! They could be anywhere! Without “an active national database of the mentally ill,” LaPierre exclaims, how can we know who they are? And without “a police officer in every school,” “a properly trained—armed—good guy” anywhere the monsters might strike, “our kids” will remain vulnerable: “There’ll be time for talk and debate later. This is the time, this is the day for decisive action.” Hysteria in defense of gun rights is no vice, apparently.
This is an appallingly silly way to think about risk.
And appallingly common: click over to the Lawfare blog, where the Brookings Institution’s Ben Wittes highlights what he deems some “provocative thoughts on the Newtown shootings and layered physical security in counterterrorism” from Carrie Cordero, who writes:
I want to see police officers posted out front at every school in America.
Yes, every school. ….
We protect ourselves. Why aren’t we protecting our kids? Our babies.
Ms. Cordero, it turns out, is Georgetown Law School’s director of national security studies, who previously “served in national security related policy and operational positions with the Department of Justice from 2000-2010.” If this is how national security professionals handle risk assessment, then it’s little wonder America’s becoming the land of surveillance cameras, paramilitary policing, and stop-and-grope travel. And if this is how major figures on the right handle horrible—but vanishingly rare—tragedies, the Second Amendment is hardly the only part of the Bill of Rights that will be at risk.
View full post on Cato @ Liberty
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/quotes_7a.gif)
