![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/quotes_7a.gif)
Police State • More than 400 new laws take effect Tuesday
More than 400 new laws take effect Tuesday
Yamiche Alcindor, USA TODAY11:10a.m. EST December 29, 20120 CommentsShare
Many deal with social media, health care, education, gay rights and child safety.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Some states made it illegal for employers to request social-media passwords
Sex offenders in Illinois will not be able to dress up as Santa
Same-sex couples in Maryland will be able to marry Jan. 1
In 2013 in Illinois, motorcyclists will be able to "proceed through a red light if the light fails to change." In Kentucky, releasing feral or wild hogs into the wild will be prohibited. And in Florida, swamp buggies will not legally be considered motor vehicles.
On Jan. 1, as crowds of people toast to a new year, more than 400 news laws across the country will take effect — and possibly improve life for some.
"The laws that state governments deal with are really the laws that impact people on a daily basis," said Jon Kuhl, a spokesman for the National Conference of State Legislatures, which tracks the bills. "Whether amending or updating laws or enacting brand new legislation, it was an active year."
In addition to the new laws of 2013, more than 29,000 laws were passed by state legislatures this year, Kuhl said. Many dealt with health care, education, gay rights, child safety and the Internet.
In several states, including Maryland, New Jersey and Delaware, lawmakers made it illegal for employers to either require or request social-media passwords from job applicants or employees. Some of those laws are already in effect. However, similar bills passed in Illinois and California become law Tuesday.
"My legislation protects workers’ privacy," said Nora Campos, speaker pro tempore of the California State Assembly and lead author of her state’s social-media bill. "The legislation is necessary because there is a hole in existing law that prevents employers from intruding into an employee’s legal off-duty conduct."
She added that California could potentially be the new model for how other states deal with social media and the workplace.
Visitors tour the Sam Jones Camp area near Clewiston, Fla., aboard an elevated swamp buggy. Under a new law, buggies can use roads if the local government allows it.(Photo: J Pat Carter, AP)
Meanwhile, Alaska became the 31st state to require health insurance companies to cover the diagnosis, testing and treatment of autism spectrum disorders for people up to the age of 21. The legislation’s passage continues a trend among states that began in 2007, Kuhl said.
Other states could follow with similar bills, and a higher number of laws could take effect when the clock strikes midnight in 2014 because four state legislatures — Montana, Nevada, North Dakota and Texas — were out of session in 2012.
Some new laws in 2013:
Same-sex couples in Maryland will be able to marry.
California clergy members will not have to perform same-sex marriages if they object.
Partial birth abortion by physicians and non-physicians will not be performed in New Hampshire except to save the life of the mother.
Sex offenders in Illinois will not be able to dress up as Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny or give out candy during Halloween.
Employers in Oregon will not be allowed to advertise a job opening if they won’t consider applicants who are unemployed.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nati … 3/1797249/
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:50 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Guess Which Asset Class Has Crushed All Others Since Tuesday?
I’ll give you a hint. It’s not stocks.
Source: Zerohedge.com
If you can’t read the tiny lettering above, the asset class is the barbarous relic, gold.
Why is gold out performing?
Could it be that Europe continues to implode and Germany now looks like it will confront a fairly nasty recession?
Could it be that the “fiscal cliff” is now just a bit too close?
Could it be that Obama was re-elected?
Could it be that with the Obama re-election, Bernanke will be that much freer to continue operating with abandon?
Gold is out performing because of all of these things, plus a few others. The financial cumulonimbus clouds continue to gather and funds, governments, even retail investors are looking for shelter from what may be a very nasty storm in the relatively near future. A storm which could even overwhelm treasuries.
That’s crazy talk though right? Frankly, I hope so. But do YOU continue to consider treasuries a truly ”riskless” asset any longer? (If you ever did, and I’m not talking just about inflation risk.)
Gold is one of the few ways investors can hedge against the rampant crony capitalism which defines much of the economic world these days. It is a check on (though not a total cure for) the current economic insanity we are witness to. It is one of the reasons the Federal Reserve hates the yellow metal.
Saying that, how much do you want to bet that Bernanke has a little (or perhaps not so little) stash of gold somewhere?
The post Guess Which Asset Class Has Crushed All Others Since Tuesday? appeared first on AgainstCronyCapitalism.org.
View full post on AgainstCronyCapitalism.org
Excursions Tuesday: Spencer, Sumner, and Social Darwinism
Today George H. Smith presents us with the second part of his look at social Darwinism. This week he explores the thinking of Herbert Spencer and William Graham Sumner, and shows how each explicitly repudiated the ideas so many today blame them for.
To associate market competition with biological competition is to misunderstand how Spencer and Sumner (and other classical liberals) viewed the market. Biological competition, in which one individual survives at the expense of other individuals, is a zero-sum game, whereas market competition is a positive-sum game in which all participants gain from voluntary cooperation. Therefore, it is precisely in a free society that social Darwinism does not apply. In a society with an advanced division of labor and where we must give others what they want in order to get what we want, the “fit” are those who can enlist the voluntary cooperation of others. When success depends upon persuasion rather than coercion, social fitness is measured by one’s ability to influence others by offering them something of value, i.e., by benefiting them.
View full post on Libertarianism.org
Excursions Tuesday: Barack Obama and Social Darwinism
In a budget speech last week, Barack Obama accused Republicans of embracing “thinly veiled social Darwinism.” In this week’s Excursions, George H. Smith argues that the President doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
It is clear that “social Darwinism” and “survival of the fittest” were intended by Obama to evoke feelings of fear and disgust. It is highly doubtful that Obama knows anything about the history of these ideas, and it is even more doubtful that he cares. A concern for truth is not the coin of the political realm. But these expressions have long been of interest to me, mainly because the great libertarian Herbert Spencer is frequently said to have originated social Darwinism.
View full post on Libertarianism.org
Excursions Tuesday: Thomas Jefferson on Public Schools
Today George H. Smith begins a new essay series with a discusion of Thomas Jefferson’s ideas about education and his plan for a decentralized system of public schools in the state of Virginia. Smith writes that contrary to the beliefs of some historians that would link Jefferson to Enlightenment advocates of state schooling like Benjamin Rush, Samuel Knox, and Noah Webster or to the common school movement of the 1830s, Jefferson favored schooling on a more local level:
The key to local school districts, according to Jefferson, is that they give parents direct and ultimate control over how their children are educated. To suppose that schools will he better managed by “any authority of the government, than by the parents within each ward…is a belief against all experience.” A government can no more manage schools than it can manage “our farms, our mills, and merchants’ stores.” Elementary education should be the concern of local communities under the supervision of parents; it should not be controlled by the federal or state governments.
Extreme decentralization was thus the centerpiece of Jefferson’s plan for public schools, and he warned of the potential consequences should this feature be ignored:
“What has destroyed liberty and the rights of man in every government which has ever existed under the sun? The generalizing and concentrating all cares and powers into one body, no matter whether of the autocrats of Russia or France, or the aristocrats of a Venetian Senate.”
View full post on Libertarianism.org
Excursions Tuesday: A Free Market in Education
Today George H. Smith brings us the fourth in his series on the critics of state education. He explores the Voluntaryist critique of those who support free trade in religion and commerce but advocate state interference in schools as well as the debate between J. S. Mill and Herbert Spencer about the proper role of government in education.
When fellow free-traders, such as Richard Cobden, supported state education, the Voluntaryists took them to task for their inconsistency. Those who embrace free trade in religion and commerce but advocate state interference in education, argued Thomas Hodgskin (a senior editor of The Economist) in 1847, “do not fully appreciate the principles on which they have been induced to act.” “We only wonder that they should have so soon forgotten their free-trade catechism,” wrote another Voluntaryist, “and lent their sanction to any measure of monopoly.”
View full post on Libertarianism.org
Excursions Tuesday: The Problem of Indoctrination and the Need for Diversity
George H. Smith has another Excursions essay for us this week, continuing his look at critics of state education. With part three of the series, he explores more of the Voluntaryist objections.
Indoctrination is inherent in state education, according to Edward Baines. State education proceeds from the principle that “it is the duty of a Government to train the Mind of the People.” If one denies to government this right — as defenders of a free press and free religion must logically do — then one must also deny the right of government to meddle in education. It “is not the duty or province of the Government to train the mind of the people,” argued Baines, and this “principle of the highest moment” forbids state education.
View full post on Libertarianism.org
Excursions Tuesday: State Education and the British Voluntaryists
George H. Smith has a new Excursions essay this morning, another in his series on the critics of state education.
One important Voluntaryist was Herbert Spencer (1820-1903), a leading libertarian philosopher of his day. Although Spencer became an agnostic, he was home-schooled in Dissenting causes by his father and uncle. “Our family was essentially a dissenting family,” Spencer wrote in his Autobiography, “and dissent is an expression of antagonism to arbitrary control.” Much of Spencer’s first political article, written in his early twenties and published in The Nonconformist in 1842, was devoted to a critique of state education, and it possibly influenced the birth of the Voluntaryist movement in the following year.
View full post on Libertarianism.org
Excursions Tuesday: Joseph Priestley and the Critics of State Education
Today Smith moves from the roots of state education to the history of its critics. He begins the series with a discussion of Joseph Priestley, the Englishman who discovered oxygen.
Revisionist works on the history of education are of uneven value, to say the least. Some blame the problems of American education on “capitalism” – that ever-popular bogeyman of restless intellectuals. For example, in Schooling in Capitalist America (1976), Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis throw everything except the proverbial kitchen sink at the feet of capitalism, including “drugs, suicide, mental instability, personal insecurity, predatory sexuality, depression, loneliness, bigotry, and hatred….” This is alarming news, indeed, but it is at least good to know that such problems do not exist in noncapitalistic societies. (Only academics could get away with this kind of Marxian claptrap.)
Even among the better revisionist works we find a troubling omission: Most pay scant attention, if any, to the libertarian critics of state schooling who flourished during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Yet these advocates of free-market education – or “Voluntaryists,” as they called themselves in nineteenth-century Britain – predicted that governmental control of education would result in precisely those problems that revisionists later complained about.
View full post on Libertarianism.org
Excursions Tuesday: Aristotle and Education
Today George H. Smith continues his examination of the intellectual roots of state education by turning to the views of Plato’s most famous student.
Aristotle (384-322 BCE) was born in Stagira, a small coastal town in the political orbit of Macedonia. He traveled to Athens while still in his teens and enrolled in Plato’s Academy, where he remained for almost twenty years. Plato’s influence on Aristotle was profound, but there were also significant differences. For example, Aristotle criticized Plato’s stress on uniformity; and, in response to Plato’s call to institute communal property among the guardians (the elite class of rulers), Aristotle defended private property with arguments that would be used for centuries thereafter.
Aristotle explicitly repudiated the notion of limited government that was defended by some of his contemporaries. He quoted the sophist Lycophron as saying that a government exists “for the sake of alliance and security from injustice” and that laws should serve as “a surety to one another of justice.” Aristotle disagreed. Rather than confine itself to this negative function — the enforcement of justice — the state should actively promote the good life.
View full post on Libertarianism.org