Gold and Silver • U.S. Banks Buy Gold Futures in Dramatic Position Change
U.S. Banks Buy Gold Futures in Dramatic Position Change
http://www.gotgoldreport.com/2013/05/us … hange.html
HOUSTON – We thought we would share with our readership an important change in the positioning of large U.S. banks in the monthly futures-only Bank Participation Report (BPR) issued by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The most recent report was published Friday, May 10 for positions as of the close on Tuesday, May 7.
The main reason we are going to the trouble of doing this short report is that there is a surprising dearth of accurate information about the new data available on the Web.
One of our members forwarded to us some coverage by others which we found utterly useless and inaccurate (showing a preconceived bias on the part of the author), so perhaps this report will provide some clarity for those who closely follow the CFTC commitments of traders reports as well as the positioning of banks in futures.
U.S. Banks Net Shorts Fall to Lowest Since Summer, 2008
Let’s start this review with our comments shared with GGR Subscribers on Sunday, May 12. After mentioning that the combined commercial traders – the Big Hedgers, which includes the U.S. banks in the Legacy COT reports – had reduced their collective net short positioning for gold to the lowest since the 2008 panic and at a “very fast pace,” we said:
“An aggressive pace of LCNS reduction with none more aggressive than U.S. banks. The Bank Participation Report (not to be confused with the weekly Legacy COT report, which is separate) shows that over the past month U.S. banks covered or offset a whopping 24,855 (60%) of their net shorts (from 41,666 to just 16,781 contracts net short). The number of U.S. banks reporting falls below 4, a tell. We have not seen the U.S. banks show so low a net short position since they briefly went slightly net long in the summer of 2008 during the panic.”
So in just one month, as gold fell a net $123.45 or 7.8% (from $1,575.67 on April 2 to $1,452.22 May 7), U.S. banks covered or offset 60% of their net short bets on gold, down to an extremely small 16,781 contracts net short. We have to go all the way back to the June 3, 2008 BPR to find a time when the U.S. banks, including bullion banks, showed a lower number of net short bets held.
In fact, in that June 2008 report the U.S. banks were actually net long gold then by 5,381 lots. (But as the graph below clearly shows they would not stay net long. By the next monthly report in July they had put on an amazing 82,228 contracts net short in just one month.)
Below is a graph showing the nominal net short positioning reported by U.S. banks to show it visually.
Interestingly, the U.S. banks net short positioning did not decline because they were reducing their short bets. Instead, 21,653 contracts of the change is attributable to the banks adding long contracts to their positioning for just this past month. They were not dumping their short contracts so much as adding longs in other words.
In just the five reporting months since December 4, 2012 as gold declined a net $245.10 or 14.4%, U.S. banks’ net shorts fell from 106,393 to 16,781, a plunge of 89,612 lots or a whopping 84.2%.
The net effect is clear to see in the graph above on a nominal basis. As gold fell down to test the $1,300s U.S. banks very strongly reduced their collective net short positioning and came within a whisker of becoming actually net long for the first time since the 2008 panic.
To standardize the results and show that there are no material anomalies in the data above, we compare the U.S. banks’ nominal net position with the total COMEX open interest in the graph below. From December 4 to last Tuesday, May 7, as gold fell from near $1,700 to as low as $1,321 before settling at $1,452, the U.S. banks’ net short positioning fell from a significant 24.5% to a miniscule 3.8% of all COMEX contracts open .
Clearly the U.S. banks, presumably including U.S. bullion banks, are not, that’s not, positioning as though they believe there is a great deal more downside left in gold futures.
If they did or do believe that gold could probe even lower than the $1,320s, they are not positioning for it in COMEX futures. That does not necessarily mean they are "right," but it is a window into how the largest, best funded and presumably the best informed traders of gold futures on the planet – the U.S. banks – are positioning, both for their own book and for their clients.*
It is rare to see the U.S. banks put on 21,000 or more long contracts in a month.** We have to believe that the U.S. banks would not have done that unless they meant to reduce their collective net short positioning in a relative hurry.
(A long contract benefits if prices rise. A short contract benefits if prices fall.)
* The U.S. bullion banks trade for their own account and for clients, which include a broad cross section of businesses in the gold trade (large bullion dealers, large holders of physical metal, jewelry merchants and manufacturers, producers, some refiners, bullion management firms and other middlemen, etc.).
** This is the largest increase in our records going back to 2006. Before this report the largest one month increase in U.S. bank longs was with the September 2, 2008 report, when the U.S. banks reported adding 17,567 lots with gold then about $805. By the following report, on October 7, gold had moved 9% higher to the $880s.
(Source for data CFTC for bank positioning, Cash Market for gold, GGR.)
Posted by Gene Arensberg at 01:13:58 PM in Got Gold Blog
Statistics: Posted by DIGGER DAN — Fri May 17, 2013 5:42 am
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Agriculture • Drought, cold cripple U.S. winter wheat crop – Western Kansa
By Roxana Hegeman
11 May 2013
(AP) – The winter wheat crop is expected to be far smaller this season compared to last, particularly for hard red varieties used in bread, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reported Friday.
In the first government projection on the harvest’s anticipated size, the National Agricultural Statistics Service estimated winter wheat production will be down 10 percent to 1.49 billion bushels, due to fewer acres — 32.7 million acres, some 6 percent fewer acres than a year ago — and a 1.8-bushel decrease in average yields, to 45.4 bushels per acre.
The government’s forecast comes amid a season marked by drought and late spring freezes in the Midwest’s major wheat growing areas, particularly in Kansas — the nation’s biggest wheat-producing state. […]
Nationwide production of hard red winter wheat, typically used to make bread, is expected to decline 23 percent to 768 million bushels. But that’ll be offset somewhat by soft red winter wheat types — favored for cookies and pastries — which are projected to be up 19 percent at 501 million bushels.
One bushel of wheat yields about 42 pounds of flour — enough to make 73 loaves of bread.
Far western Kansas is considered a disaster area, and farmers told tour participants earlier this month that crop insurance agents have already begun writing off acres there. Wheat tour participants examined 570 fields, finding that in south-central Kansas, which got late winter snowstorms and heavy spring rains, the wheat looks good and production there is expected to offset a bit the losses elsewhere in the state. [more]
http://www.desdemonadespair.net/2013/05 … wheat.html
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Wed May 15, 2013 1:45 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Associated Press says U.S. government seized journalists’ phone records

No big deal. Just the Department of Justice seizing the phone records of reporters and editors over a 2 month period. Nothing weird or intimidating about that.
(From Reuters.com)
AP Chief Executive Gary Pruitt, in a letter posted on the agency’s website, said the AP was informed last Friday that the Justice Department gathered records for more than 20 phone lines assigned to the agency and its reporters.
“There can be no possible justification for such an overbroad collection of the telephone communications of The Associated Press and its reporters,” Pruitt said in the letter, which was addressed to Attorney General Eric Holder.
View full post on AgainstCronyCapitalism.org
American • U.S. citizens ditch passports in record numbers
U.S. citizens ditch passports in record numbers
May 8, 2013: 1:35 PM ET
If the recent quarter’s pace continues, 2013 will become a landmark year for saying goodbye to America, tax-wise.
By Lynnley Browning
Mahmood Karzai, no longer a U.S. citizen.
FORTUNE — Americans are ditching their U.S. passports in record numbers, a sign of growing frustration with a system that taxes U.S. citizens on their global wealth whether they live in Montana or Mongolia.
The latest bold-faced names to relinquish their U.S. citizenship include Mahmood Karzai, a brother of Hamid Karzai, the president of Afghanistan, according to federal data released Wednesday. Also on the list, published quarterly by the Internal Revenue Service, is Isabel Getty, the daughter of jet-setting socialite Pia Getty and Getty oil heir Christopher Getty.
In total, more than 670 U.S. passport holders gave up their citizenship — and with it, their U.S. tax bills — in the first three months of this year. That is the most in any quarter since the I.R.S. began publishing figures in 1998. And it is nearly three-quarters of the total number for all of 2012, a year in which the wealthy songwriter-socialite Denise Rich (christened "Lady Gatsby" by Yachting magazine) and Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin joined more than 932 other Americans in tossing their passports.
If the recent quarter’s pace continues, 2013 will become a landmark year for saying goodbye to America, tax-wise.
MORE: Offshore account holders win a victory in government tax case
"It’s the cumulative effect of the I.R.S. ‘jihad’ against foreign bank accounts," said Phil Hodgen, an international tax lawyer in Pasadena, Calif. He said growing numbers of Middle Eastern investors were ordering their dual-citizen children to dump their U.S. passports if they wanted to inherit family-owned companies without onerous U.S. estate taxes.
While dumping citizenship may seem unpatriotic or smack of tax avoidance to some critics, tax lawyers blame the byzantine complexity of American tax regulations.
The rules "are confusing, complex, and so complicated that even Americans with good intentions can easily find themselves running afoul of the law," said Jeffrey Neiman, a former federal prosecutor who was involved in the government’s offshore banking probe and is now in private practice in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. "This very well may explain why we are seeing a record number of Americans renouncing their United States citizenship."
The trend has swelled amid a widening crackdown by the U.S. Justice Department on offshore private banking services sold by Swiss and Swiss-style banks to wealthy Americans in recent years. Nearly a dozen foreign banks, include Israel’s Bank Leumi, HSBC, Credit Suisse (CS), Julius Baer and Swiss cantonal, or regional, banks are under criminal scrutiny; last year, Wegelin & Co, Switzerland’s oldest bank, was indicted and put out of business. More than four dozen wealthy Americans and their foreign bankers have been indicted or charged in recent years.
More than 39,000 Americans have come forward in recent years to declare their secret accounts to the I.R.S. in exchange for reduced fines and penalties, but officials suspect that is a fraction of the total number of people either deliberately hiding or unwittingly not reporting their foreign accounts. I.R.S. data for 2012 shows just over two million tax returns filed in 2012 by overseas Americans, compared with an estimated six million Americans living or working abroad. Only a fraction of Americans with foreign bank accounts are also filing required disclosures known as Fbars, according to federal data.
http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2013/05/ … ?iid=HP_LN
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Thu May 09, 2013 12:17 am
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Gold and Silver • U.S. Mint gold bullion coins sales highest in 3 years
U.S. Mint gold bullion coins sales soar in April to highest in 3 years
American Eagle silver bullion coins sales are on the threshold of setting records as year-to-date sales have never been achieved so early in the year.
http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/content/ … &sn=Detail
Author: Dorothy Kosich
Posted: Wednesday , 01 May 2013
RENO (MINEWEB) –
U.S. Mint figures show American Eagle gold coin sales hit a three-year high of 209,500 ounces in April, the highest since December 2009 sales of 231,500 coins. These figures include 187,500 one-ounce American Eagle bullion coins.
Year-to-date total gold coin sales now stand at 502,000 ounces as of Tuesday, April 30th. American Eagle one-ounce bullion coins sales now stand at 434,000 ounces as of that date. U.S. Mint spokesman Michael White told Bloomberg that the one-ounce gold bullion coins are the most popular for investors.
Gold prices recorded their biggest one-day loss in dollar terms in 30 years on April 15th.
(See also: Gold notches up biggest ever daily loss)
On April 16th gold prices fell to their lowest level in 16 months, prompting many bargain hunters to invest in gold bullion coins. Sales were so brisk; the U.S. Mint sold out of its smallest gold coin, the one-tenth ounce, forcing the Mint to suspend sales of the coin around April 24th.
By comparison, last April, the Mint reported only 20,000 American Eagle one-ounce gold coins and a total of 26,000 gold coins sold during the month.
Meanwhile American Eagle silver bullion coins sales for the month of April shot up nearly 169% over than last year from 1,520,000 silver ounces in April 2012 to 4,087,00 ounces. “Year-to-date sales of 18,310,000 have never been achieved so soon in a year,” Coin News observed Tuesday. “Last year sales did not top 18.3 million until July 16.”
Statistics: Posted by DIGGER DAN — Fri May 03, 2013 9:06 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Gold and Silver • Will The U.S. Mint Run Out Of Silver?
Will The U.S. Mint Run Out Of Silver?
GoldSilver.com
APRIL 23, 2013
http://goldsilver.com/article/will-the- … ch%20Video
In mid-January of this year, the U.S. Mint announced that it was forced to suspend sales of 1-ounce American Eagle silver bullion coins Because, “after just two weeks, it was sold out of its entire inventory.”
The demand for silver from small investors in the form of coins has been Dramatic– “a record 7.5 million ounces of silver coins were sold in January.”
Many retailers are out of American Silver Eagle Coins currently.
There is a big problem; however, the U.S. Mint is not the limiting factor. Over the years, Silver Eagle bullion coins have been minted at various facilities, but for more than a decade they had been struck only in West Point.
After 2010, the San Francisco facility was added, and now both locations are minting silver Eagles, leaving the U.S. mint with a capacity To "strike between 50 million and 60 million American Eagle silver bullion coins annually to meet demand, but ongoing inability to secure sufficient planchets stifles full use of that capacity.”
A planchet is a “Blank,” the input to the U.S. Mint pressed into coin. Deputy U.S. Mint Director Richard A. Peterson maintains That "the bureau is struggling with a lack of success in its efforts to find additional planchet suppliers.”
The mint did plan ahead, and increased production of the silver bullion Coins "by 20 percent in January 2013 to meet projected demand, but the increase over January 2012 levels, when 6,107,000 coins were sold, was insufficient.” The U.S. Mint suspended sales of its 2013 American Eagle silver bullion coins following the quick depletion of inventory early on.
When sales resumed in late January, buyers were placed on an “allocation system” that limits the number of coins any retailer may obtain.
To allay fears that the U.S. Mint may be running out of silver, it’s important to note that, although industrial uses for silver are expanding, there are still tons of recyclable silver that could be melted down – that is, if the price offered is high enough.
Since we know silver coin blanks represent a real world limitation in supply, this teaches a very important reason why physical silver bullion under one’s full control trumps synthetic paper-mâchés ( Exchange Traded Funds, ETFs ) and allocated precious metal investment models.
American Silver Eagle coins are valued higher than the spot price of silver ( the cost for the raw material, unwrought silver ). Current eBay prices on most government issued silver coins are hovering at prices around +50% over the spot price for silver, putting the retail physical price as high as the middle $30s per ounce.
Many holding physical silver are surely looking at prices and asking themselves: “What sell-off?”
Below is a screenshot from 24hgold.Com showing silver coin prices from eBay.
Are you holding Physical Silver Bullion yet?
Statistics: Posted by DIGGER DAN — Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:29 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
American • Boston bombing suspect had U.S. citizenship application halt
Boston bombing suspect had U.S. citizenship application halted in recent months
JOHN SCHWARTZ and JULIA PRESTON
BOSTON and NEW YORK — The New York Times News Service
Published Saturday, Apr. 20 2013
Tamerlan, 26, died early Friday after a shootout with police in Watertown, Mass. Officials said that at the time of his death, his application for citizenship was still under review and was being investigated by federal law-enforcement officials.
It had been previously reported that Tamerlan’s application might have been held up because of a domestic-abuse episode. But the officials said that it was the record of the FBI interview that threw up red flags and halted, at least temporarily, the citizenship application. Federal law-enforcement officials reported Friday that the FBI had interviewed Tamerlan in January, 2011, at the request of the Russian government, which suspected that he had ties to Chechen terrorists.
The officials pointed to the decision to hold up that application as evidence that Tamerlan’s earlier encounter with the FBI had not fallen through the cracks in the vast criminal and national security databases that the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI review as a standard requirement for citizenship. The application, which was presented on Sept. 5, 2012, also prompted “additional investigation” of him this year by federal law enforcement agencies, according to the officials. They declined to say how far that examination had progressed or what it covered.
The investigation into the Boston Marathon bombings turned Saturday to questions about the men’s motives and to the significance of a six-month trip Tamerlan took to Russia and Chechnya in 2012. Law enforcement officials are now conducting a review of that trip, to see if Tamerlan might have met with extremists or received training from them while abroad, current and former intelligence and law enforcement officials said.
“It’s a key thread for investigators and the intelligence community to pull on,” Kevin R. Brock, a former senior FBI and counterterrorism official, said.
Tamerlan had submitted his citizenship application only six days after his brother and suspected accomplice in the bombings, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, had his own citizenship application approved.
Federal prosecutors were drafting a criminal complaint Saturday against Dzhokhar, who was wounded in the leg and neck and had lost a great deal of blood at the time he was captured Friday evening.
A spokeswoman for Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Kelly Lawman, confirmed on Saturday that Dzhokhar was being treated there, but declined to comment on his condition. The FBI would be providing any updates, she said. U.S. officials said a special interrogation team for high-value suspects would question him, but he was still unable to speak.
Late last year Homeland Security officials contacted the FBI to learn more about its interview with Tamerlan, federal law-enforcement officials said. The FBI reported its conclusion that he did not present a threat. At that point, Homeland Security officials did not move to approve the application nor did they deny it, but they left it open for “additional review.”
Tamerlan’s record also showed that he had been involved in an episode of domestic violence in 2009. His father, Anzor, said in an interview Friday in Makhachkala, in the Russian republic of Dagestan, where he lives, that Tamerlan had a spat with a girlfriend and he “hit her lightly.”
Under immigration law, certain domestic-violence offenses can disqualify an immigrant from becoming a U.S. citizen, and perhaps expose him to deportation. But the Homeland Security review found that while Tamerlan was arrested, he was not convicted in the incident. The law requires a serious criminal conviction in a domestic-violence case for officials to initiate a deportation, federal officials said.
Both Tsarnaev brothers came to the United States and remained here legally under an asylum petition in 2002 by their father, who claimed he feared for his life because of his activities in Chechnya. Both sons applied for citizenship after they had been living here as legal permanent residents for at least five years, as the law requires.
The FBI and local law enforcement agencies continued to gather evidence and investigate Monday’s twin bombings, the slaying of an MIT police officer Thursday night and the subsequent battle with the police that left another officer critically wounded.
The official said that the criminal complaint against Dzhokhar will likely include a constellation of charges stemming from both the bombing and the shooting, possibly including the use of weapons of mass destruction, an applicable charge for the detonation of a bomb. That charge, the official said, carries a maximum penalty of death. While Massachusetts has outlawed the death penalty, federal law allows it.
Questions also arose concerning the arrest and prosecution Dzhokhar, and whether he should be given a Miranda warning and other elements of constitutional rights in criminal cases. Investigators did invoke what the Justice Department has called a public-safety exception to delay the discussion of the Miranda rule with Dzhokhar.
Miranda rules require investigators to warn a suspect in custody of the right to remain silent and to have a lawyer present. If prosecutors want to use statements at a trial that a defendant made in custody, the police must first have advised him of his rights, the Supreme Court ruled in 1966 to protect against involuntary self-incrimination. The court later created an exception, allowing prosecutors to use statements made before any warning in response to questions about immediate threats to public safety, such as where a gun is hidden.
The question of applying those rules in terrorism cases arose after a Nigerian named Umar Farouk Abdulmuttalab tried to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner on Dec. 25, 2009. After landing in Michigan, he was given painkillers for burns and confessed to a nurse. He also spoke freely to FBI agents for 50 minutes before going into surgery.
After he awoke, the FBI read Abdulmuttalab the Miranda warning, and he stopped co-operating for several weeks.
Further attention surrounds the government’s early scrutiny of Tamerlan and whether possible warning signs may have been missed.
As federal officials now step up their investigation, an important element will be the trip Tamerlan made to Russia and Chechnya in 2012. In early 2011, the FBI said in a statement, “a foreign government” – now acknowledged by officials to be Russia – asked for information about Tamerlan, “based on information that he was a follower of radical Islam and a strong believer, and that he had changed drastically since 2010 as he prepared to leave the United States for travel to the country’s region to join unspecified underground groups.” A senior law enforcement official said they feared he could be a risk, and “they had something on him and were concerned about him, and him travelling to their region.”
The bureau responded to the request by checking “U.S. government databases and other information to look for such things as derogatory telephone communications, possible use of online sites associated with the promotion of radical activity, associations with other persons of interest, travel history and plans, and education history,” the statement explained. The bureau also interviewed Tamerlan and family members. According to the statement, “the FBI did not find any terrorism activity, domestic or foreign,” and conveyed those findings to “the foreign government” by the summer of 2011. As the law enforcement official put in, “We didn’t find anything on him that was derogatory.”
Tamerlan did travel to Russia early last year and returned six months later, on July 17, a law enforcement official said. He spent most of the time with his father in Makhachkala, the capital of the Dagestan region, the men’s father, Anzor Tsarnaev, told a Russian interviewer, but “we went to Chechnya to visit relatives,” he said.
Members of the Tsarnaev family in Makhachkala recalled those interviews vividly. In an interview in Russia, Zubeidat Tsarnaeva, the mother of the two men, said that the FBI had questioned her older son closely. She recalled that they told her he was “an excellent boy.” But “at the same time they told me he is getting information from really, extremist sites, and they are afraid of him.”
The state news agency RIA Novosti quoted Anzor Tsarnaev about the FBI’s close questioning, “two or three times,” of Tamerlan. Anzor, who lives in a five-storey, yellow brick building in a working-class neighborhood of the city, recalled that the agents told his son, “We know what you read, what you drink, what you eat, where you go.” He said that they told Tamerlan that the questioning “is prophylactic, so that no one set off bombs on the streets of Boston, so that our children could peacefully go to school.”
Those comments, he said, disturbed him. “This conversation took place a year and a half ago. But there is a question, why would they talk about it then?”
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/wor … e11436598/
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:41 am
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
Supreme Court Wisely Rules that U.S. Law Doesn’t Apply Outside the U.S.
Ilya Shapiro
As Walter Olson notes below, today the Supreme Court correctly ruled in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum that the Alien Tort Statute, like any federal law not explicitly stating otherwise, does not cover actions occurring outside the United States. That is, you can’t bring a suit in U.S. court just because it involves a “violation of the law of nations” (the conduct that the ATS addresses).
As Chief Justice Roberts said in announcing the decision, even a claim that a foreigner committed such an international-law violation against another foreigner isn’t enough to counter the presumption that laws don’t have extra-territorial application. Indeed, in such a case – and Kiobel’s allegations of human rights abuses by Nigerians against Nigerians in Nigeria is such a case – there is even less of a reason to invoke the jurisdiction of American courts than if some American dimension existed (e.g., the citizenship of one of the parties or the location of the conduct).
Nothing in the text of the ATS overcomes that basic presumption against extra-territoriality and the Court’s fascinating historical exposition demonstrates why the First Congress – the ATS was enacted in 1789 as one of our first laws – wouldn’t have wanted to change that practice or make the fledgling republic a “uniquely hispitable forum for the enforcement of international norms.”
As Cato’s amicus brief argued, the Founders understood “the law of nations” to provide a methodology for defining the extraterritorial scope of ATS jurisdiction. Their understanding of jurisdiction rested on the nexus between territory and sovereignty; the law of nations as of 1789 recognized a territorial nexus between the state asserting jurisdiction and the claim asserted. That the law of nations permits jurisdiction over piracy on the high seas or in other unique circumstances doesn’t mean that a U.S. court may assert jurisdiction over conduct occurring entirely within the territory of a foreign sovereign.
Finally, the Court correctly noted that the mere fact that corporations are present in the case – the original issue was whether the ATS recognized corporate liability – doesn’t somehow change the extraterritorial-applicability calculus. In Kiobel, even the corporations were foreign (Dutch and British oil companies), with nobody alleging that so much as a U.S. subsidiary was involved.
At the end of the day, this was an exceedingly complicated case with a relatively simple solution. Well done, Supreme Court.
View full post on Cato @ Liberty
American • Looking back at April’s month of horror in U.S.
By: Curtis Rush News reporter, Published on Tue Apr 16 2013
The Boston Marathon explosions occurred on Patriots’ Day in Massachusetts.
Tragically, the day will forever be linked with the deaths of at least three people and hundreds of injuries.
The day is a civic holiday in the state.
Patriots’ Day commemorates the first battles of the American Revolutionary War: the Battles of Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775.
As President Obama said in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon explosions: “It’s a day that celebrates the free and fiercely independent spirit that this great American city of Boston has reflected from the earliest days of our nation.”
Some speculated that the significance of the holiday was somehow related to the attack.
The timing of the attack also led to reflection on some of the other horrible events that have occurred in the month of April in the United States.
Here are some other unrelated, although tragic, events that took place in the same week over the years:
The Oklahoma City bombing (April 19, 1995).
The Waco assault (April 19, 1993).
The Columbine school shootings (April 20, 1999).
The Virginia Tech massacre (April 16, 2007).
The Deepwater Horizon oil drilling rig exploded (April 20, 2010), killing 11 workers and starting an oil spill that left the Gulf of Mexico and the Gulf Coast devastated.
http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/ … in_us.html
Statistics: Posted by yoda — Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:52 pm
View full post on opinions.caduceusx.com
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/quotes_7a.gif)